Re: endpoint definition

+1


David Orchard wrote:

>This conversation seems slightly bizarre.  Using the word resource in
>the definition of endpoint makes sense.  The only "identifying" part of
>the endpoint has the type anyURI, thus the word Resource is already part
>of the type.  If issue #1 had been closed some other way, then maybe I
>could see a different term used.
>
>If people don't like the words "resource" and "dereference" in the web
>context, they really should have commented on the architecture of the
>www.  
>
>Cheers,
>Dave
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
>>    
>>
>[mailto:public-ws-addressing-
>  
>
>>request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mark Baker
>>Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 7:30 PM
>>To: Jim Webber
>>Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
>>Subject: endpoint definition
>>
>>
>>(time for a new subject, I think)
>>
>>Hi Jim,
>>
>>On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:45:44AM -0000, Jim Webber wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>>"A Web service endpoint is a (referenceable) resource to
>>>>which Web service messages can be addressed. Endpoint
>>>>references convey the information needed to address a Web
>>>>service endpoint."
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>-1
>>>
>>>That's very sneaky Mark :-)
>>>      
>>>
>>Me, sneaky? 8-)
>>
>>But seriously, my proposal was just to remove redundant information,
>>    
>>
>not
>  
>
>>to change the meaning.  Saying "entity, processor, or resource" is
>>    
>>
>akin
>  
>
>>to saying "red, blue, or a colour"; might as well just say "a colour".
>>
>>    
>>
>>>"A Web service endpoint is a (referenceable) software agent to which
>>>      
>>>
>Web
>  
>
>>>service messages can be addressed. Endpoint references convey the
>>>information needed to address a Web service endpoint."
>>>      
>>>
>>That would be a significant restriction over what's permitted by the
>>current definition, and would prevent a whole lot of Web-style
>>interactions.  -1
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Mark.
>>--
>>Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>

Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 14:44:49 UTC