- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:00:36 -0500
- To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
+1 On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 08:31:37PM -0800, David Orchard wrote: > > This conversation seems slightly bizarre. Using the word resource in > the definition of endpoint makes sense. The only "identifying" part of > the endpoint has the type anyURI, thus the word Resource is already part > of the type. If issue #1 had been closed some other way, then maybe I > could see a different term used. > > If people don't like the words "resource" and "dereference" in the web > context, they really should have commented on the architecture of the > www.
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 05:21:30 UTC