- From: Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:13:43 +0000
- To: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
- Message-ID: <421B05D7.2060200@arjuna.com>
+1 Anish Karmarkar wrote: > > Our charter deliverables [1] consists of core, SOAP binding and WSDL > binding docs. WSDL binding spec defines the use of WS Addr components > in both WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 MEPs and provide mechanisms for defining > WS Addr property values in WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 descriptions. I.e., use of > addressing with both WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 is in the same doc. > > The schedule in the charter calls for: > * LC of WSDL binding in March 2005 > * CR for WSDL binding in May 2005 > * PR for WSDL binding in August 2005 and > * REC for WSDL binding in Oct 2005. > > I'm very concerned that having WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 binding in the same > document will delay the use of WS-Addressing in conjunction with WSDL > 1.1. WSDL 2.0 is in LC right now and may go to second LC. WSDL 2.0 is > also not a "fast track" WG like the WS-Addressing WG. I don't see how > we can keep the current schedule for the WSDL 2.0 binding. > > Given the schedule issues associated with WSDL 2.0 and the need to use > WS-Addressing with SOAP and WSDL 1.1 as soon as possible, I would like > to discuss the possibility of splitting the WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 > bindings into two different documents. Splitting the two and > "releasing" the WSDL 1.1 spec not too long after (or even at the same > time with) the core/SOAP spec would be extremely useful for the Web > service community. > > Comments? > > -Anish > -- > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/09/wsa-charter.html#deliverables >
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 10:21:06 UTC