- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:05:51 +0100
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20050211110551.GA28036@w3.org>
Hi Noah. * noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> [2005-01-30 19:14-0500] > You wrote this note on January 10th, and it occurred to me then that some > of the issues you explore might be fruitful points of discussion in the > F2F meeting between the TAG and WS-Addressing groups at the plenary (for > the moment, I'm speaking for myself here, and not on behalf of the TAG). > Since then, you've had your Melbourne F2F, and I believe there has been > progress on identity issues. I wonder whether you might care to send a > note updating the attached, either informally or officially on behalf of > the WS-Addressing group, and whether you agree that some of these issues > might be likely points of discussion? I'd also of course welcome opinions > from the TAG. The consensus of the Group with regards to issue i001 after our Melbourne face-to-face is that EPRs are not identifiers, so my analysis collapses to the following: an EPR contains an [address] property which is the address (URI) for the endpoint, the rest being data and metadata. However, what this [address] URI precisely refers to is currently under discussion, and this relates to your issue EndpointsRef47 (see the thread starting at [1]). I suspect that this will be something that we will want to discuss at our joint meeting. Regards, Hugo 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Feb/0022.html -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Friday, 11 February 2005 11:05:53 UTC