- From: Rick Rineholt <rineholt@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:04:36 -0500
- To: <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF13FBCE6C.0EE42F7F-ON852570DD.005C1AAC-852570DD.005D9B8C@us.ibm.com>
Paul, I think this is the right decision. However, one minor clarification, the only reason I chose to use "echoIn" and "echoOut" for my messages is that I believed that is the message pattern as I interpreted the WSDL at the time. There was an "echo" in the schema but it did not connect to any operations in the port as I read the WSDL. My personal experiences with interops are when there appears to be conflicting information the order they are resolved in are: specifications, WSDL and then the samples and other interop documentation. In addition while I can't say it's wrong or that it violates any best practices I haven't come across any cases ever working with interops,demos etc where they are the same. There is Rick Rineholt "MAINTENANCE FREE -- It's impossible to fix." rineholt@us.ibm.com <paul.downey@bt.com> Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org 12/20/2005 07:35 To Rick Rineholt/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS cc <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org> Subject proposed breaking change to echo global element declaration The tests currently use the same Global Element Declaration (GED) 'echo' for both request and response which reflects my personal preference not to use 'wrapped' style documents. However this does impose an architectural style on implementations: the current tests require an endpoint which handles both 'echo' requests and 'echo' responses to dispatch based upon wsa:action, and not the GED. *but* I'm told GED dispatching is intrinsic to more than one of implementations we hope to demonstrate interoperating during CR. I understand that this may be contentious, but the only way to support both world views is to make the GED of the echo request an 'echoIn' element and the GED of the response an 'echoOut' element, as per IBM's public endpoint: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing-tests/2005Dec/0034.html I'm happy to make such a change, but this will impact anyone who has implemented the testsuite, so please raise any objections you have ASAP. Paul
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2005 17:02:43 UTC