- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:31:24 -0800
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Yes, it's friendly. Maybe we won't need Chad after all. :-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Hugo Haas [mailto:hugo@w3.org] > Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 1:36 PM > To: Jonathan Marsh > Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org > Subject: Re: CR10 : Refined proposal. > > * Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com> [2005-12-05 12:34-0800] > > You seem to think the term "Best Practice" as used in AoWWW is a weak > > term. Perhaps it's not what they really meant when writing that > > document? That's strange, but if you don't think that term correctly > > conveys the intent, I'm willing to abstract it out as well. > > > > It also seems the more we can encourage people to actually read AoWWW > > the better, so they understand those benefits and can actually make use > > of them. Further encouragement to read section 2 might help here. > > This proposal looks much better than proposal 5 to me. > > One minor nit: > > > Proposal 5a: The W3C Architecture of the World Wide Web [AoWWW] > > recommends [Section 2.1] the use of URIs to identify resources. Using > > abstract properties of an EPR other than [destination] to identify > > resources is contrary to this recommendation. In certain circumstances, > > such a use of additional properties may be convenient or beneficial; > > however, when building systems, the benefits or convenience of > > identifying a resource using reference parameters should be carefully > > weighed against the benefits of identifying a resource solely by URI as > > explained in [Section 2. Identification] of the Web Architecture. > > > > One more option shouldn't make the chadding any more difficult... > > I'd like to replace "W3C Architecture of the World Wide Web" by > "Architecture of the World Wide Web, Volume One", as this is the > document we are talking about. Also, the whole section about > identification is section 2, and the one about benefits of URIs is > section 2.1, so I think that the references are backwards. > > Let me crystallize this as proposal 5b, which hopefully is a friendly > amendment to 5a: > > Proposal 5b: The Architecture of the World Wide Web, Volume One > [AoWWW] recommends [Section 2 of AoWWW] the use of URIs to identify > resources. Using abstract properties of an EPR other than > [destination] to identify resources is contrary to this > recommendation. In certain circumstances, such a use of additional > properties may be convenient or beneficial; however, when building > systems, the benefits or convenience of identifying a resource using > reference parameters should be carefully weighed against the > benefits of identifying a resource solely by URI as explained in > [Section 2.1] of the Web Architecture. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2005 00:31:54 UTC