- From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:56:14 -0500
- To: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <mark.little@jboss.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
> > One way or another we should definitely add some tests. > > feel free to submit test cases, I think the format is fairly > clear. At this stage I think they'd be 'OPTIONAL' or 'INFORMATIONAL' > unless they're aimed specifically at WSDL CR. Er... I think we should perhaps gather opinions on this. The problem is that the results for WSO2 -> just-about-everyone are actually (assuming our interpretation is correct) logs demonstrating IMPROPER behaviour according to our current spec. If I get a message with no FaultTo, a ReplyTo of "none", and a duplicate To header, we should NOT be getting a fault back on the HTTP backchannel. So, we should really probably fix the test assertions (by adding something like "(no ReplyTo) OR (ReplyTo == anonymous)") for a bunch of these tests, and also add the new one I described (I'll submit that in the correct format). I don't think this should be OPTIONAL or INFORMATIONAL. I don't want to hold things up, but nor do I want a test suite that doesn't match our spec. --Glen
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2006 20:57:51 UTC