- From: Kevin Conner <Kevin.Conner@jboss.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 09:47:56 +0000
- To: Kevin Conner <Kevin.Conner@jboss.com>
- CC: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, WS-Addressing Tests <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
Kevin Conner wrote: > Comments on Sun->JBoss failures > > It looks like the failing tests are using localhost ReplyTo addresses, > can you update your test client to use your public IP address instead? > > We are probably returning the reponse to a localhost port that does not > exist. I have gone through the network logs on my home machine, just to double check what is happening (I wasn't sure whether the submitted logs were being changed by a logging proxy). Here is an example of the message we are receiving. As you can see the ReplyTo address is set to a locahost endpoint. We are sending a reply to that address, faulting because it doesn't exist and then trying to send a destination unreachable. We log a failure against the sending of the fault as there is no address to return it to (no From or FaultTo). Kev <?xml version="1.0" ?> <s:Envelope xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope" xmlns:ns1="http://example.org/notify" xmlns:ns2="http://example.org/echo" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <s:Header> <wsa:ReplyTo xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing" s:role="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope/role/none"> <wsa:Address> http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous </wsa:Address> </wsa:ReplyTo> <To xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"> http://213.162.124.157:8080/interop/soap/InteropTest </To> <MessageID xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"> uuid:12dc1068-22d8-4441-831e-3ee15ec2a547 </MessageID> <ReplyTo xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"> <Address> http://localhost:8080/jaxwsa-w3c_s12/nonanonymous </Address> </ReplyTo> <Action xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"> http://example.org/action/echoIn </Action> </s:Header> <s:Body> <ns2:echoIn>test1251</ns2:echoIn> </s:Body> </s:Envelope>
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2006 09:48:11 UTC