- From: Kevin Conner <Kevin.Conner@jboss.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 09:47:56 +0000
- To: Kevin Conner <Kevin.Conner@jboss.com>
- CC: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, WS-Addressing Tests <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
Kevin Conner wrote:
> Comments on Sun->JBoss failures
>
> It looks like the failing tests are using localhost ReplyTo addresses,
> can you update your test client to use your public IP address instead?
>
> We are probably returning the reponse to a localhost port that does not
> exist.
I have gone through the network logs on my home machine, just to double
check what is happening (I wasn't sure whether the submitted logs were
being changed by a logging proxy). Here is an example of the message we
are receiving. As you can see the ReplyTo address is set to a locahost
endpoint.
We are sending a reply to that address, faulting because it doesn't
exist and then trying to send a destination unreachable. We log a
failure against the sending of the fault as there is no address to
return it to (no From or FaultTo).
Kev
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<s:Envelope xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"
xmlns:ns1="http://example.org/notify"
xmlns:ns2="http://example.org/echo"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<s:Header>
<wsa:ReplyTo xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"
s:role="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope/role/none">
<wsa:Address>
http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous
</wsa:Address>
</wsa:ReplyTo>
<To xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
http://213.162.124.157:8080/interop/soap/InteropTest
</To>
<MessageID xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
uuid:12dc1068-22d8-4441-831e-3ee15ec2a547
</MessageID>
<ReplyTo xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
<Address>
http://localhost:8080/jaxwsa-w3c_s12/nonanonymous
</Address>
</ReplyTo>
<Action xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
http://example.org/action/echoIn
</Action>
</s:Header>
<s:Body>
<ns2:echoIn>test1251</ns2:echoIn>
</s:Body>
</s:Envelope>
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2006 09:48:11 UTC