Re: remote participation?

Unfortunately due to last minute priority changes, JBoss isn't going to 
be able to participate at the face-to-face. Will the endpoints be 
published by the participants afterwards, so testing can occur later?

Mark.


paul.downey@bt.com wrote:

>Hi Mark
>
>all there is so far is:
>
>Members' only meeting logistics:
>http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/6/jan-f2f.html
>
>public announcement:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Dec/0034
>
>public invitation:
>http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/addr-event/
>
>Nothing crafted for third-parties joining the interop
>event. I'd suggest bothering Mark directly about 
>remote participation, but failing that I'll raise it
>(again) on the next telcon.
>
>Paul
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@jboss.com]
>Sent: Thu 12/29/2005 5:47 PM
>To: Downey,P,Paul,CXMA C
>Subject: Re: remote participation?
> 
>Paul, can you point me at the logistics page?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mark.
>
>
>paul.downey@bt.com wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Mark
>>
>>fyi, maybe we need instructions for people who don't
>>have access to the logistics page.
>>
>>Paul
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org on behalf of Mark Little
>>Sent: Wed 12/28/2005 11:43 AM
>>To: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
>>Subject: Re: remote participation?
>>
>>
>>I didn't get a reply to this, so I thought I'd resend.
>>
>>Mark.
>>
>>
>>Mark Little wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Although JBoss is hopefully going to participate in the testing by 
>>>attending the meeting, there's still a possibility that we may not be 
>>>able to. In which case, are there any possibilities of remote 
>>>participation?
>>>
>>>Mark.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>

Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:08:52 UTC