Re: test1238

I seem to stumble upon this one now and then :)

Thanks for reminding.

Thanks,
-Arun

paul.downey@bt.com wrote:
> Hi Arun,
> 
> we've discussed this several times on the testing calls, and in the WG
> and on each occasion came to the conclusion that it's an interesting 
> corner case for the interaction between WS-Addressing and SOAP and 
> therefore worth keeping as an "informational" testcase.
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing-tests/2005Aug/0000.html
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org on behalf of Arun Gupta
> Sent: Tue 2/28/2006 8:00 PM
> To: WS-Addressing Tests
> Subject: test1238
>  
> 
> test1238 [1] sends a SOAP message with a mustUnderstand header and 
> "none" FaultTo. Following WS-A semantics, because FaultTo is none, no 
> fault should be sent back. But even then there is a fault response sent 
> from B to A.
> 
> What WS-A feature is this testcase trying to test ?
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/testcases/#test1238
> 
> -Arun

-- 
got Web Services ?
Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
http://java.sun.com/webservices

Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2006 21:14:12 UTC