W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > February 2006

RE: Action in 1133, 1134

From: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:01:32 +0000
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "WS-Addressing Tests" <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF9212B799.C5AC7675-ON8025711C.00315A62-0025711C.003191A3@uk.ibm.com>
I think #2 is enough as #3 will be done by WSDL Binding testing.

David Illsley
Web Services Development
MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
+44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)

"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
21/02/2006 06:26

"Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "WS-Addressing Tests" 

RE: Action in 1133, 1134

Excellent point, related to CR22 which was resolved today, which
strengthens the guidance for protocol authors to SHOULD define their own
custom actions.  Application faults I think also SHOULD define their own
custom actions.  However, SHOULD isn't MUST so we have some leeway:

Some candidates for solutions are:
1) manually override these results to pass, but that's not as good as...
2) remove that assertion in favor of one simply checking that the Action
is there.
3) define a custom application-level fault action for purposes of the
testsuite such as "http://example.org/action/fault", and change these
testcases to use it.  Implementations would need to change too to
generate this fault.  This probably assures they are capable of using
faults other than the predefined addressing one, which is good, but that
seems beyond testing the spec for CR purposes, which is bad.

#2 good enough?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-
> addressing-tests-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arun Gupta
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 3:48 PM
> To: WS-Addressing Tests
> Subject: Action in 1133, 1134
> test1133, 1134, 1233, 1234 has a check for:
> soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:Action =
> 'http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/fault'
> AIU, this value is to be used for WS-Addressing faults only where as
> the tests above throw an application specific fault. I understand the
> relevance of this check in test114XX and 124X.
> I can change my implementation to pass this test but would like to
> understand if this is a valid check ?
> -Arun
> --
> got Web Services ?
> Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
> http://java.sun.com/webservices
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2006 09:01:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:29:01 UTC