W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > October 2005

RE: A few more things...

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:45:49 +0100
Message-ID: <2A7793353757DB4392DF4DFBBC952255E187CA@I2KM11-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>, <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>

> Test 1205 2 XPaths use different prefixes for alertcontrol. It would be 
> simpler to write automated tests if the testcases only used the one prefix 
> for each namespace.
> Would it be possible to change this so they match?

OK, for the example documents I've made the namespace prefixes match:

My 'observer' uses an XPath processor, so as long as the prefixes
used in the XPath expressions are known, all should be well, and 
of course I'm sure you realise that real implementations will send quiet 
differently serialised documents with different namespace prefixes and declarations.

> Tests: 1232, 1233, 1234 Missing @ from xpaths. Should be 
> /soap12:Envelope/soap12:Header/customer:CustomerKey/@wsa:isReferenceParameter

right! fixed!

> Test 1231 - notify/soap12/message10.xml wsa:Action does not match that 
> checked for by XPath

ok, actually echo/soap12/message1.xml

> Test 1234 - echo/soap12/message8.xml Does not include a wsa:To, test1234 
> includes a test for wsa:To

added one.

> Test 1234 - echo/soap12/fault1.xml CustomerKey value is Fault#123456789. 
> XPath looks for Key#123456789


> ... and fingers crossed that's it all checked.

thx! and sorry, so many errors, hopefully my 'observer' should catch
further errors of this kind from now on.

Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 22:46:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:29:01 UTC