- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:54:14 +0100
- To: <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
W3C - Web Services Addressing Testing TF call
26 Oct 2005
Agenda:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-addressing/2005Oct/0019.html
Present:
Paul Downey (BT)
Arun Gupta (Sun)
David Illsley (IBM)
Mike Vernal (Microsoft)
Hugo Haas (W3C)
Glen Daniels (Sonic)
Regrets:
David Hull (TIBCO)
Chair/Notes:
paul
[coverage of identified features]
short walk through of coverage exhibited by features:
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/features/
and message exchanges:
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/exchanges/
Test cases are missing are mainly in the areas
of core abstract features, SOAP 1.1 messages and call-back
scenarios
ACTION: pauld to put Arun's document under CVS
(DONE: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/submissions/Sun/CR_TestCases.html)
[submission of new tests]
Mike has a set of tests from Microsoft to be submitted
soon, in Word document format. Mike will look at the
XML format for test cases. Paul to assist with the
conversion.
Will review coverage once these test cases have been added.
Axis may have test cases to submit.
[implementation / test methodology issues]
No objections to the message exchanges and use of HTTP 202
in the callback message exchanges. Lack of one-way binding
may become an issue when we come to a WSDL description.
Discussion of how testing would take place - public endpoints
(v) black boxes, how to write such an endpoint, the capture of
messages, who would act as 'observer', how an observer would
obtain messages, can we reuse the WS-I test tools, how to know
which scenario a captured message belongs to, etc. These topics
warrant further discussion on this call, possible at the WG F2F
in two week's time.
[feedback on the test suite documentation]
David asks about WSDL for the current test cases.
ACTION: pauld to provide rudimentary WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 documents
Michael asks about test case 1209 (anonymous value for wsa:To
in a one-way message). No objections to removing this test case
as other tests exhibit feature 'core05'.
ACTION: pauld to remove test case 1209
(DONE)
Discussion of test case 1205 (one-way message triggers SOAP
mustUnderstand fault). After a collective double-take (faultTo has
an address of none) we realise that SOAP processing takes place
before addressing processing, so test is valid. Actually a good one!
ACTION: pauld to clarify this test case description
(DONE: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/testcases/#test1205)
--
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:54:23 UTC