- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:54:14 +0100
- To: <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
W3C - Web Services Addressing Testing TF call 26 Oct 2005 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-addressing/2005Oct/0019.html Present: Paul Downey (BT) Arun Gupta (Sun) David Illsley (IBM) Mike Vernal (Microsoft) Hugo Haas (W3C) Glen Daniels (Sonic) Regrets: David Hull (TIBCO) Chair/Notes: paul [coverage of identified features] short walk through of coverage exhibited by features: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/features/ and message exchanges: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/exchanges/ Test cases are missing are mainly in the areas of core abstract features, SOAP 1.1 messages and call-back scenarios ACTION: pauld to put Arun's document under CVS (DONE: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/submissions/Sun/CR_TestCases.html) [submission of new tests] Mike has a set of tests from Microsoft to be submitted soon, in Word document format. Mike will look at the XML format for test cases. Paul to assist with the conversion. Will review coverage once these test cases have been added. Axis may have test cases to submit. [implementation / test methodology issues] No objections to the message exchanges and use of HTTP 202 in the callback message exchanges. Lack of one-way binding may become an issue when we come to a WSDL description. Discussion of how testing would take place - public endpoints (v) black boxes, how to write such an endpoint, the capture of messages, who would act as 'observer', how an observer would obtain messages, can we reuse the WS-I test tools, how to know which scenario a captured message belongs to, etc. These topics warrant further discussion on this call, possible at the WG F2F in two week's time. [feedback on the test suite documentation] David asks about WSDL for the current test cases. ACTION: pauld to provide rudimentary WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 documents Michael asks about test case 1209 (anonymous value for wsa:To in a one-way message). No objections to removing this test case as other tests exhibit feature 'core05'. ACTION: pauld to remove test case 1209 (DONE) Discussion of test case 1205 (one-way message triggers SOAP mustUnderstand fault). After a collective double-take (faultTo has an address of none) we realise that SOAP processing takes place before addressing processing, so test is valid. Actually a good one! ACTION: pauld to clarify this test case description (DONE: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/testcases/#test1205) --
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 19:54:23 UTC