W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > December 2005

Re: WSDL and request/response messages

From: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:33:48 +0530
To: paul.downey@bt.com
Cc: david.illsley@uk.ibm.com, public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org, rineholt@us.ibm.com
Message-id: <43A790B4.4070401@sun.com>

>>as does Aruns about the actions.
> is the wsaw namespace stable? I'd rather hold off 
> until the WSDL binding is in CR and we're CR testing
> it before adding such extensions.

Agreed wsaw namespace is not fully stable, and also agreed that this is 
not WSDL Binding interop testing. But associating an Action with an 
operation has been defined since WD. Anyway, these WSDL documents are 
not tested for interop so each vendor is free to create their own WSDLs 
and thus adding their extensiblity elements but I thought it would be a 
good idea to specify explicit Action since vendors may be doing that 

Also, specifying wsaw:Action on input/output operation does not change 
any semantics.


> Sorry for not getting back on this sooner.
> Paul

got Web Services ?
Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2005 05:00:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:29:01 UTC