- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:11:31 -0000
- To: <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, <rineholt@us.ibm.com>, <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>
David, Rick, Arun > I think Ricks question re echo vs echoIn/echoOut still needs > addressed Describing a message/reply interaction in which the response may be sent in the HTTP response, or in a separate interaction as a result of a HTTP 202 remains a 'challenge' for WSDL. So I added an 'echo' operation as well as the two one-way 'echoIn' and 'echoOut' operations as a convinience for some but I now see it only adds confusion. I suggest I remove it. > as does Aruns about the actions. is the wsaw namespace stable? I'd rather hold off until the WSDL binding is in CR and we're CR testing it before adding such extensions. Sorry for not getting back on this sooner. Paul
Received on Monday, 19 December 2005 18:12:11 UTC