W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > December 2005

Some inconsistencies in the tests?

From: Rick Rineholt <rineholt@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:42:13 -0700
To: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF0BB4EE18.33A53D0F-ON852570D0.00438E06-852570D0.005B90D5@us.ibm.com>
Would like some clarification in what I perceive as some inconsistencies 
in the test descriptions

- The the WSDL shown http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/documents/ 
only has the uri "example.com" yet through this and other documents there 
is reference to also "example.org".
- My interpretation of the WSDL is that the request messages in SOAP body 
should all have an element with the local name "echoIn" the responses 
should have "echoOut".  There
is an "echo" operation but that maps to a schema that is still using 
"echoIn" and "echoOut"; yet there are example of messages with just "echo"
- Most of the example messages in the soap Body don't have a "/" in the 
end of namespace URI, the schema in the WSDL does.


Also, I'd like to propopse a change  that all messages have the name of 
JUST the test in the message for example:
......
  <soapenv:Body>
      <m:notify xmlns:m="http://example.com/notify/">test1100</m:notify>
   </soapenv:Body></soapenv:Envelope>
....

I think this can and will aid in debugging. Note: some tests required an 
empty message to key off when to throw a fault. I guess for those the 
endpoint could recognize the specifc test case to  throw the fault.

Thanks!

Rick Rineholt
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2005 04:07:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:29:01 UTC