- From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:19:19 -0700
- To: <tom@coastin.com>, <public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org>
I would add a sentence along the lines of
{The introduction XML 1.1 causes interoperability concerns in real
implementations far out of proportion to the profferred benefits at the
abstract level.}
After the second sentence in your writeup.
--umit
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-comments-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-comments-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Tom Rutt
> Sent: Tuesday, Jul 19, 2005 7:52 AM
> To: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Rough draft of rational for using xml shema 1.0 data types
>
>
> Here is a first cut at a rationale:
>
> "This specification uses xml schema 1.0 data types to specify the
> contents of its soap headers. This was deemed necessary to
> define the
> contents with sufficient precision to foster
> interoperability. Future
> versions of this specification may be revised to incorporate schema
> definitions compatible with xml 1.1."
>
> Tom Rutt
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
> Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2005 15:19:01 UTC