- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:19:12 +0900
- To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2021/11/29-wot-discovery-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Farshid!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] https://www.w3.org/
WoT Discovery
29 November 2021
[2]Agenda. [3]IRC log.
[2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#29_November_2021
[3] https://www.w3.org/2021/11/29-wot-discovery-irc
Attendees
Present
David_Ezell, Kaz_Ashimura, Kunihiko_Toumura,
Michael_McCool Farshid_Tavakolizadeh, Tomoaki_Mizushima
Regrets
-
Chair
McCool
Scribe
FarshidT
Contents
1. [4]Review minutes
2. [5]Issues and PRs
1. [6]XPath
2. [7]Moving terms to Architecture
3. [8]XPath
4. [9]TD/Thing ID
5. [10]PR242 (Add placeholder section for thing model)
6. [11]Issue 219 (Define role of "Discoverer/Registerer")
Meeting minutes
Review minutes
McCool: last time discussed JSONPath and XPath
McCool: didn't come to a final conclusion about XPath
no objections to publishing
Issues and PRs
McCool: terminology and use case cleanup in discovery
McCool: in Profiles, they intend to make self-describing
mandatory with well-known URLs. It is just for HTTP
Farshid: Ben has some concerns about the limitation in use of
well-known URLs in a system which exposes multiple TDs
McCool: we need to look into the spec to see if it prevent the
use of base paths
McCool: one problem is that well-known path should be
sufficient to find the final endpoint given the IP or hostname.
So basepath is not useful.
… we could consider returning an array if multiple TDs are
involved.
… we could end up with scalability issues if there are many TDs
XPath
[12]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/238
[12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/238
McCool: documenting the discussion on issue...
… [13]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/
238#issuecomment-981738436
[13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/238#issuecomment-981738436
Moving terms to Architecture
[14]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/241
[14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/241
Toumura: Only Enriched TD is left
McCool: Any reason why Enriched TD is not moved as well?
… we can move that as well and leave no discovery terms in this
spec
Toumura: will update the PR to move Enriched TD as well
Farshid: I've added a comment on the PR on arch-side about the
open issue about discoverer term
McCool: Let's proceed with the PRs and we can discuss the term
afterwards.
XPath
David: Concerned that JSONPath is not as powerful as XPath
TD/Thing ID
McCool: concern from the TD side about the use of TD.id as the
identifier of TDs in discovery
PR242 (Add placeholder section for thing model)
[15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/242
[15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/242
Farshid: adding the section with editorial note only
merged
Issue 219 (Define role of "Discoverer/Registerer")
[16]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/216
[16] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/216
McCool: [17]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/
216#issuecomment-981772546
… to check the term definition
[17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/216#issuecomment-981772546
<kaz> [adjourned]
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
[18]scribe.perl version 159 (Fri Nov 5 17:37:14 2021 UTC).
[18] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Monday, 10 January 2022 09:19:16 UTC