- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:19:12 +0900
- To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at: https://www.w3.org/2021/11/29-wot-discovery-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Farshid! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] https://www.w3.org/ WoT Discovery 29 November 2021 [2]Agenda. [3]IRC log. [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#29_November_2021 [3] https://www.w3.org/2021/11/29-wot-discovery-irc Attendees Present David_Ezell, Kaz_Ashimura, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_McCool Farshid_Tavakolizadeh, Tomoaki_Mizushima Regrets - Chair McCool Scribe FarshidT Contents 1. [4]Review minutes 2. [5]Issues and PRs 1. [6]XPath 2. [7]Moving terms to Architecture 3. [8]XPath 4. [9]TD/Thing ID 5. [10]PR242 (Add placeholder section for thing model) 6. [11]Issue 219 (Define role of "Discoverer/Registerer") Meeting minutes Review minutes McCool: last time discussed JSONPath and XPath McCool: didn't come to a final conclusion about XPath no objections to publishing Issues and PRs McCool: terminology and use case cleanup in discovery McCool: in Profiles, they intend to make self-describing mandatory with well-known URLs. It is just for HTTP Farshid: Ben has some concerns about the limitation in use of well-known URLs in a system which exposes multiple TDs McCool: we need to look into the spec to see if it prevent the use of base paths McCool: one problem is that well-known path should be sufficient to find the final endpoint given the IP or hostname. So basepath is not useful. … we could consider returning an array if multiple TDs are involved. … we could end up with scalability issues if there are many TDs XPath [12]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/238 [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/238 McCool: documenting the discussion on issue... … [13]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/ 238#issuecomment-981738436 [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/238#issuecomment-981738436 Moving terms to Architecture [14]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/241 [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/241 Toumura: Only Enriched TD is left McCool: Any reason why Enriched TD is not moved as well? … we can move that as well and leave no discovery terms in this spec Toumura: will update the PR to move Enriched TD as well Farshid: I've added a comment on the PR on arch-side about the open issue about discoverer term McCool: Let's proceed with the PRs and we can discuss the term afterwards. XPath David: Concerned that JSONPath is not as powerful as XPath TD/Thing ID McCool: concern from the TD side about the use of TD.id as the identifier of TDs in discovery PR242 (Add placeholder section for thing model) [15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/242 [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/242 Farshid: adding the section with editorial note only merged Issue 219 (Define role of "Discoverer/Registerer") [16]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/216 [16] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/216 McCool: [17]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/ 216#issuecomment-981772546 … to check the term definition [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/216#issuecomment-981772546 <kaz> [adjourned] Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by [18]scribe.perl version 159 (Fri Nov 5 17:37:14 2021 UTC). [18] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Monday, 10 January 2022 09:19:16 UTC