[wot-ig/wg] minutes - 12 May 2021

available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2021/05/12-wot-minutes.html


also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Michael Lagally!

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] https://www.w3.org/


                             ¡V DRAFT ¡V
                               WoT-IG/WG

12 May 2021

   [2]IRC log.

      [2] https://www.w3.org/2021/05/12-wot-irc


Attendees

   Present
          Daniel_Peintner, Dave_Raggett, Ege_Korkan, Kaz_Ashimura,
          Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Koster, Michael_Lagally,
          Michael_McCool, Philipp_Blum, Sebastian_Kaebisch,
          Tetsushi_Matsuda, Tomoaki_Mizushima

   Regrets
          -

   Chair
          Sebastian

   Scribe
          mlagally

Contents

    1. [3]Agenda bashing
    2. [4]Guests and Invited Experts
    3. [5]minutes
    4. [6]Linked Data Signatures WG Proposed Charter
    5. [7]Smart Cities Workshop
    6. [8]NGIOT Workshop
    7. [9]Testfest planning
    8. [10]F2F planning
    9. [11]document status
   10. [12]Liaisons
   11. [13]TF reports
   12. [14]Summary of resolutions

Meeting minutes

  Agenda bashing

   Dave: I have been asked to present WoT at the [15]https://
   www.ngiot.eu/event/ngiot-thematic-workshop-health-and-care/
   meeting
   ¡K Relationship between edge computing and WoT
   ¡K focus on healthcare

     [15] https://www.ngiot.eu/event/ngiot-thematic-workshop-health-and-care/


   Kaz: add this topic to marketing?

   Dave: meeting is already next Tuesday

   <dsr_> Dave has been asked to present WoT in relation to Edge
   computing for health & care

   <dsr_> next Tuesday

  Guests and Invited Experts

   mccool: there are some agenda topics that are interesting to
   newcomers, were just copied over

   Sebastian: MKoster has rejoined as invited expert

   Koster: Started working at company "Passive Logic"
   ¡K chief ontologist, information model, we build an industrial
   control system using digital twins

   Sebastian: welcome back

   Kaz: Koster, let's please discuss about possible membership
   later

   Koster: sure

   Sebastian: New member from Schaeffler, they have a 6 months
   trial membership
   ¡K will ask him to introduce when he's here

   Kaz: I created a dedicated mailing list, group-wot-ie@w3.org,
   for invited experts, we can use this list for general
   information like webex coordinate

  minutes

   <kaz> [16]May-5

     [16] https://www.w3.org/2021/05/05-wot-minutes.html


   Sebastian: (walks through the minutes)
   ¡K No objections, minutes are approved

  Linked Data Signatures WG Proposed Charter

   <kaz> [17]McCool's support on the lds-wg-charter repo

     [17] https://github.com/w3c/lds-wg-charter/issues/78


   <kaz> [18]proposed draft Charter

     [18] https://w3c.github.io/lds-wg-charter/index.html


   McCool: Linked Data signatures WG
   ¡K we worked on a PR for signatures, there's also this WG
   charter being proposed
   ¡K I summarized our work, suggested what we would like to see in
   terms of convergence
   ¡K Their charter refers WoT, they want to collaborate
   ¡K we need to proceed and potentially align later with their
   standard
   ¡K Currently we state "we are discussing", can we make this
   "supports"
   ¡K what do people think?

   Sebastian: this is important technology, would be nice if it
   would be available

   Lagally: their timeline is long, their charter goes until Sept
   2023
   ¡K we should ask for initial input for our draft

   Kaz: agree to support this work. regarding concrete
   relationship/dependency between our specs and their specs, we
   need to talk with PLH, etc., later, though the group decide to
   change the title of issue [19]https://github.com/w3c/

   lds-wg-charter/issues/78 to "Web of Things (WoT) WG supports
   the W3C LDS WG"

     [19] https://github.com/w3c/lds-wg-charter/issues/78


   Resolution: the group decide to change the title of issue
   [20]https://github.com/w3c/lds-wg-charter/issues/78 to "W3C Web
   of Things (WoT) WG supports the W3C LDS WG"

     [20] https://github.com/w3c/lds-wg-charter/issues/78


   McCool: I'm asking for group endorsement, you could also do
   company endorsement

   Sebastian: This is similar to JSON-LD 1.1, work in parallel and
   have close exchange

  Smart Cities Workshop

   <kaz> [21]CfP

     [21] https://www.w3.org/2021/06/smartcities-workshop/

   Sebastian: smart city workshop planned for June, deadline is
   June

   Kaz: We have 3 submissions from the WoT group - As I mentioned
   from the program committee mailing list, we can invite other
   speakers. so please let us know if you believe anybody to be
   invited.

   Sebastian: there may be one more proposal from BMW

  NGIOT Workshop

   <dsr_> [22]workshop page/

     [22] https://www.ngiot.eu/event/ngiot-thematic-workshop-health-and-care


   <dsr_> Invited by Rolf Riemenschneider Head of sector Iot CNECT

   Dave: Please send me links to recent slide decks I can present

   <kaz> [23]preso for march f2f

     [23] https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/main/PRESENTATIONS/2021-03-online-f2f


   Kaz: Check the presentation area of the last F2F

   Dave: I searched via web page, looked for material there

   Sebastian: we plan for that, will discuss in marketing

   <sebastian> [24]https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/main/

   PRESENTATIONS/2021-03-online-f2f/
   2021-03-15-WoT-F2F-Summary-McCool.pdf

     [24] https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/main/PRESENTATIONS/2021-03-online-f2f/2021-03-15-WoT-F2F-Summary-McCool.pdf


   Sebastian: it would be interesting to have more healthcare use
   cases, could input from other people

   <sebastian> [25]https://www.w3.org/WoT/documentation/


     [25] https://www.w3.org/WoT/documentation/


   Dave: We could invite gatekeeper project members

   Sebastian: Soumya also presented in yesterday's UC call about
   the EU project he's working on

   <kaz> [Soumya's project was "IntellioT"]

   Dave: Will check who in the gatekeeper project can present

   <dsr_> Gatekeeper project on applying WoT to healthcare and
   linking WoT with HL7's FHIR standard for medical records

   <dsr_> hence interest in binding templates for integrating FHIR
   within TD's

   Sebastian: let's use the use case call for that

   Lagally: yes, let's use this as the channel

  Testfest planning

   <kaz> [26]Testfest wiki

     [26] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_June_2021#Testfest


   <kaz> [27]Testfest repo

     [27] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/tree/main/events/2021.06.Online


   McCool: cannot chair the plugfest call today, ege can you
   please take over?

   Ege: can host the call for 30 mins

  F2F planning

   <sebastian> [28]https://doodle.com/poll/p7dher5i2umr4ap8


     [28] https://doodle.com/poll/p7dher5i2umr4ap8


   Sebastian: Please provide your options
   ¡K Skeleton of the F2F Wiki page is available at:

   <sebastian> [29]vF2F wiki

     [29] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_June_2021#Virtual_F2F


   Kaz: plugfest Wiki - WebEx is already allocated for the plug
   fest part

  document status

   TD is in review, call for resolution to publish on May 19th,
   please review and provide comments
   ¡K Use Cases document, transition request is approved, will be
   published tomorrow

   <kaz> [30]static HTML for publication

     [30] https://w3c.github.io/wot-usecases/publication/1-fpign/index.html


   Kaz: I have created the static version, will publish tomorrow

   Lagally: Thanks to all contributors and to co-editors McCool,
   Matsukura and Mizushima

  Liaisons

   McCool: ITU-T will meet and get back to us on our Liaison
   letter

   Kaz: Echonet, they are still working, will ping in a while

   Kaz: IEC CDD - Update next Monday

   Dave: ECLASS: We need to make concrete proposal before we can
   present to Jeff

   Kaz: submissions from ECLASS and OGC were made to Smart Cities
   workshop, we can also discuss there

   McCool/Koster: IETF: no update

   Sebastian: OPC/UA - waiting for feedback from OPC foundation on
   cooperation

  TF reports

   Daniel: Scripting: discussions about property operations,
   return values, ...
   ¡K some systems have different types of return values that
   currently cannot be described in a TD

   <Ege> [31]https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/193

   is the issue daniel mentioned

     [31] https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/193


   McCool: Security: signature type discussion, only single type
   to minimize testing

   McCool: discovery: 3 more calls until we have final draft, will
   go 2 hour meeings for next weeks
   ¡K editor's draft has diverged significantly, several pending
   MRs
   ¡K some proposals to refactor the API to make it more RESTful
   ¡K need Ben to discuss and resolve

   Sebastian: DID should be considered in discovery?

   McCool: there are proposed forms of DIDs, not fully fleshed out
   yet

   Sebastian: marketing: French version of subtitles is available,
   Spanish is coming next

   Lagally: use cases: publication of 1.0 version, new UCs being
   submitted

   Lagally: architecture: big step forward wrt profiles, clarified
   property semantics.

   Sebastian: aob?

   tomorrow's architecture call will be cancelled due to a public
   holiday

   <kaz> [main call adjourned; Plugfest call starts in 5 mins]

Summary of resolutions

    1. [32]the group decide to change the title of issue https://
       github.com/w3c/lds-wg-charter/issues/78 to "W3C Web of
       Things (WoT) WG supports the W3C LDS WG"


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    [33]scribe.perl version 131 (Sat Apr 24 15:23:43 2021 UTC).

     [33] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html

Received on Monday, 12 July 2021 06:37:13 UTC