W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-wg@w3.org > January 2021

[wot-architecture] minutes - 17 December 2020

From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:02:44 +0900
Message-ID: <87a6su1yuz.wl-ashimura@w3.org>
To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:

also as text below.




      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                            WoT Architecture

17 Dec 2020


      [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Architecture_WebConf#Agenda


          Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_Lagally, Ryuichi_Matsukura,





     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]Prev minutes
         2. [5]Architecture
         3. [6]Profile issues
         4. [7]DTDL
         5. [8]AOB
     * [9]Summary of Action Items
     * [10]Summary of Resolutions

   <scribe> scribenick: kaz

Prev minutes


     [11] https://www.w3.org/2020/12/10-wot-arch-minutes.html

   Lagally: don't see any problems
   ... and would approve the minutes

   (no objections and approved)


   [12]wot-architecture issues

     [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues


     [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/569

   Lagally: boilerplate text on diversity

   Kaz: had discussion with Ralph, Philippe and Wendy
   ... need to wrap-up the discussion

   Lagally: would assign you to this issue then

   Kaz: ok

   [14]Issue 561

     [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/561

   Lagally: on lifecycle
   ... should be defined in the UCTF

   [15]Lagally's comment

     [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/561#issuecomment-747500979

   [16]Issue 536

     [16] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/536

   Lagally: keep this open

   [17]Issue 546

     [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/546

   Lagally: editorial change on co-editors

   [18]Issue 546

     [18] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/546

   Lagally: requirements on time stamps and time series

   Kaz: we can transfer this issue to the wot-usecases repo
   ... though we need to add the labels (media, meig,
   requirements) after that transfer

   [19]Issue 522

     [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/522

   Lagally: we need an owner for this issue

   [20]Issue 511

     [20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/511

   Lagally: to be transferred to wot-usecases

   [21]Issue 479

     [21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/479

   Lagally: agriculture requirements
   ... can close this issue itself since we've got input from

   kaz: yeah, and we can create another issue on agriculture for
   Cristiano on the wot-usecases repo

   Lagally: ok
   ... (and close it)

   [22]Issue 472

     [22] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/472

   Lagally: requirements template
   ... already done

   kaz: maybe McCool wants to add some more security portions

   Lagally: ok
   ... (adds comments and then transfers to wot-usecases)

   [23]Issue 465

     [23] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/465

   Lagally: to be moved to wot-usecases

   [24]Issue 458

     [24] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/458

   Lagally: to be moved to wot-usecases

   [25]Issue 457

     [25] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/457

   Lagally: to be moved to wot-usecases

   [26]Issue 456

     [26] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/456

   Lagally: to be moved to wot-usecases

   [27]Issue 454

     [27] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/454

   Lagally: terminology for "Thing Template"
   ... note that it's now "Thin Model"
   ... and the Architecture spec already has one definition for

   <scribe> ... (closed the issue)

   [28]Issue 453

     [28] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/453

   Lagally: terminology for "partial TD"
   ... need a MR

   [29]Issue 446

     [29] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/446

   Lagally: can be closed
   ... (closed the issue)

   [30]Issue 437

     [30] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/437

   Lagally: thought we had fixed the typos

   kaz: just to make sure, we can quickly skim the REC

   [31]WoT Architecture REC

     [31] https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/REC-wot-architecture-20200409/

   Lagally: (checks the REC)


     [32] https://w3c.github.io/wot-architecture/

   Lagally: (and the ED)
   ... regarding the section 4.2.1, would like to keep the
   structure to have just one subsection for the moment
   ... but would close the issue 437 itself

   rm: ok

   [33]Issue 420

     [33] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/420

   Lagally: typo fixed
   ... (closed)

   [34]Issue 416

     [34] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/416

   Lagally: it' done
   ... (closed)

   [35]Issue 200

     [35] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/200

   Lagally: done
   ... (closed)

   [36]Issue 352

     [36] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/352

   Lagally: also done
   ... (closed)

   [37]Issue 412

     [37] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/412

   Lagally: keep this open
   ... to be discussed during the next call

   [38]Issue 417

     [38] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/417

   Lagally: will talk with Ege

   [39]Issue 350

     [39] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/350

   Lagally: done
   ... (closed)
   ... now we have 38 open issues

Profile issues

   [40]Issue 55

     [40] https://github.com/w3c/wot-profile/issues/55

   Lagally: ongoing

   [41]Issue 56

     [41] https://github.com/w3c/wot-profile/issues/56

   Lagally: needs discussion
   ... actually a question for the Use Cases TF
   ... btw, need to work on the feedback on FPWD

   [42]Issue 7

     [42] https://github.com/w3c/wot-profile/issues/7

   Lagally: keep this open
   ... btw, we have to put more effort for WoT Profile
   ... should provide necessary information for developers


   [43]DTDL repo

     [43] https://github.com/Azure/opendigitaltwins-dtdl

   Lagally: (mentions Microsoft's Digital Twins Definition
   Language repo)


   Lagally: (summarizes what happened this year, 2020)
   ... we published a REC for 1.0 version and a FPWD for 1.1
   ... would expect we work hard to add clarification to 1.1
   ... also work harder for Profile portions
   ... the next Architecture call should be held on 14 January

   [time for beer and happy holidays!]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]

    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    David Booth's [44]scribe.perl version ([45]CVS log)
    $Date: 2021/01/27 10:01:51 $

     [44] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [45] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2021 10:02:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 27 January 2021 10:02:52 UTC