- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:18:42 +0900
- To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2020/11/12-wot-arch-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks,
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
WoT Architecture
12 Nov 2020
[2]Agenda
[2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Architecture_WebConf#Agenda
Attendees
Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_Lagally, Tomoaki_Mizushima,
Sebastian_Kaebisch
Regrets
Chair
Lagally
Scribe
kaz
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Minutes
2. [5]FPWD status
3. [6]Profile
4. [7]Use Cases
5. [8]Requirements
6. [9]AOB
* [10]Summary of Action Items
* [11]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<scribe> scribenick: kaz
Minutes
[12]Oct-15
[12] https://www.w3.org/2020/10/15-wot-arch-minutes.html
Lagally: conversation during/after the vF2F
... got resolution for the FPWD publication
(no objections)
Lagally: approved
FPWD status
[13]transition request for WoT Architecture 1.1
[13] https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/282
Lagally: approved and no blocking issue for FPWD
Kaz: right
<mlagally_>
[14]https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/releases
[14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/releases
<mlagally_>
[15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/releases/tag/FPWD-1
.1
[15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/releases/tag/FPWD-1.1
Lagally: created release tag as above
Kaz: ok
... will check the document with checkers for publication
Lagally: btw, you mentioned a comment within the transition
request?
Kaz: yes
[16]PLH's comment
[16] https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/282#issuecomment-723282838
Profile
[17]transition request for WoT Profile
[17] https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/285
Kaz: no comment from Philippe but just approved :)
... but I myself added a note that it would have been better to
use "Web of Things (WoT) Profile" as the title of the document
Lagally: let's go for it :)
... (creates a PR)
Kaz: ah, I thought I had already created a PR :)
[18]PR 53
[18] https://github.com/w3c/wot-profile/pull/53
Lagally: let's merge that then
... (and merged it)
Use Cases
[19]wot-usecases repo
[19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases
Lagally: (visits the wot-usecases repo)
... during the Use Cases call today, we talked about two new
use cases
[20]VR-AR use case
[20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/blob/master/USE-CASES/vr-ar-imaging.md
Lagally: one of the two is about VR/AR use cases
<inserted> [21]Irrigation in outdoor environment use case
[21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/blob/master/CONTRIBUTIONS/Agricultural-use-case2.md
<inserted> ml: and another is on agriculture
Lagally: (explains the use case)
... we need to indicate a way for accuracy
Sebastian: we have to clarify the data
... metadata on the interaction level
Lagally: get temperature and return results
Kaz: btw, I misunderstood this proposal was generated by Lionel
from Lyon U because he made the Pullrequest
... but it seems the original proposers are not Lionel himself
... so this proposal is related to the discussion we started
yesterday about how to deal with proposals/contributions from
non-Members
... I'll check with Lionel as well
Lagally: ok
... need further discussion during the main call too
... (goes into the detailed description)
[22]VR-AR use case
[22] https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/blob/master/USE-CASES/vr-ar-imaging.md
Lagally: this is about VR/AR use cases
... expected devices include VR goggle and 3D camera
... how to deal with the streaming data is important
... can use the VR headset to browse the resources
... how should we move forward with accuracy and reliability of
the data?
Sebastian: we should create an issue and have discussion during
the TD calls
Lagally: ok
... should discuss additional metadata, etc.?
Sebastian: yeah, introducing new terms would not be harmful
... on the other hand, we should be careful about how to deal
with the requirements
... need elaborate what is really needed
Lagally: ok
... some of the new use cases would explain the validity of new
features
... will create an issue for the disscusion
Requirements
[23]wot-architecture repo - REQUIREMENTS area
[23] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/tree/master/REQUIREMENTS
Lagally: we have several requirements descriptions
... agriculture, discovery, geolocation, ...
... link relation types
... requirements from the new WG Charter
... Thing Model
Sebastian: we've introduced a new concept for Thing Model
Lagally: yeah
Sebastian: what is the meaning behind the "link" here?
Lagally: we had some discussion yesterday (during the TD call)
... link relation types to be archived at IANA
... included related standards here
Web Linking: [24]https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8288
[24] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8288
Link Relation Types for Web Services:
[25]https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8631
[25] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8631
Additional Link Relation Types:
[26]https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6903
[26] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6903
[27]https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988
[27] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988
Link Relation Types - IANA registry:
[28]https://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relati
ons.xhtml
[28] https://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml
]]
Sebastian: there are 2 examples here. right?
[29]wot-thing-description Issue 999
[29] https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/999
Lagally: example of Oracle's device model above (Issue 999)
Sebastian: what is the relationship?
Lagally: (goes through the example codes)
Sebastian: how to handle the device components?
Lagally: think the recommended way should be embedding the
models into the Thing Description
Sebastian: ok
... would like to continue the discussion on Thing Model during
the TD call next Wednesday
AOB
Lagally: any other business for today?
(none)
[adjourned]
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
David Booth's [30]scribe.perl version ([31]CVS log)
$Date: 2020/12/17 14:35:46 $
[30] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[31] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 11 January 2021 07:18:48 UTC