- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 16:58:26 +0900
- To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2020/08/25-wot-marketing-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Cristiano!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
WoT Marketing
25 Aug 2020
[2]Agenda
[2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Marketing_WebConf#August_25.2C_2020
Attendees
Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Daniel_Peintner, Kunihiko_Toumura,
Michael_McCool, Cristiano_Aguzzi
Regrets
Sebastian_Kaebisch
Chair
McCool
Scribe
cris
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Previous minutes
2. [5]TPAC vF2F video
3. [6]Explainer video
4. [7]Tutorials and videos
* [8]Summary of Action Items
* [9]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<kaz> scribenick: cris
Previous minutes
<kaz> [10]Jul-30
[10] https://www.w3.org/2020/07/30-wot-marketing-minutes.html
McCool: any news from Coralie?
Kaz: we need to wait
McCool: should be publish the minutes?
... ok minutes approved
TPAC vF2F video
McCool: we have already an explainer video, we could use that
one (maybe a little bit edited)
Kaz: ok, seems reasonable
Daniel: is the explainer video ready for September 21st?
McCool: well we have set the deadline for the middle of
September, we can do it
... another option is to create a PowerPoint presentation and
do a voice over
Kaz: we can also have a brief tutorial on WoT using zoom or
webex
McCool: I think the propose here is to explain what WoT is
... rather than a tutorial
Kaz: Explainer video might be sufficient but if not, recording
a brief description on WoT using zoom is a possible fallback.
Explainer video
[11]Animator's comments (Member-only)
[11] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2020Aug/att-0382/General_Requirements_IOT_Motion_14082020_JCB.docx
McCool: the animator answered with a bunch of points
... the animator is suggesting to change winemaker to a
fruit/vegetable producer
... is anybody have any objection?
... ok
... another point is to make scene 4 less specific
... i.e. remove the address
... on scene 6 is not going to do pronunciation specification
... do we have the source files of the logos in scene 6?
Daniel: maybe they were made by Christian
McCool: the source it is useful so that we can spare some money
then we have to check licensing problems
Kaz: we should think more about the accessibility
McCool: we already talk about this with the animator
... i.e. he will use another color scheme
... we will send the slides to the animator and in the worst
case we'll ask him to draw them
... I already sent the new logo
... in scene 7 we need some code
... we need an example of node-wot
... better if it is related to agriculture
... also we need a TD
... can someone provide it? daniel?
Daniel: if I have a TD I may create a simple code snippet that
use it
McCool: let's see which TDs we have in the wot-testing repo
... can you create something from scratch?
... we will have a fake ui with just a graph showing some
temperature samples
Cristiano: I can help here
Daniel: sure I'll share the first draft to you and then we can
improve it
McCool: when you have finished please ping directly the
animator
... can you also send the powerpoint?
Daniel: I have to first talk with christian, but then sure
McCool: in scene 10 the animator said that they are going to
read the sentence instead of staying silent
... I think it is ok
... do we agree to use this version of the logo (showing the
new logo)?
Cristiano: ok for me
McCool: I also add Sebastian to the animator's answer
... I put the answer on Github
<Zakim> kaz, you wanted to suggest we add the W3C logo in the
WoT welcome page
Kaz: I wanted to talk about the W3C logo mainly for the WoT
Welcome page, but probably we should include the W3C logo into
the explainer video as well.
<dape>
[12]https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/logo-usage-20000308
[12] https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/logo-usage-20000308
McCool: ok we'll use also the w3c logo and after that we'll
show the WoT logo
<McCool> [13]McCool's summarize responses to the animator
[13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/blob/master/material/README.md
<McCool> [14]Animator's questions
[14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/blob/master/material/General Requirements_IOT_Motion_14082020_JCB.docx
McCool: ok we are done here
... I am sending the answer to the animator
... any objection?
<inserted> (no objections)
McCool: ok, sent
Tutorials and videos
McCool: part of the video shows the developer looking for WoT
tutorials and videos
<dape> [15]http://www.thingweb.io/videos.html
[15] http://www.thingweb.io/videos.html
<dape> [16]http://www.thingweb.io/hands-on.html
[16] http://www.thingweb.io/hands-on.html
McCool: I know we have some node-wot stuff
... we also have a node-red video
... any update about this?
<dape> [17]https://w3c.github.io/wot-marketing/developers/
[17] https://w3c.github.io/wot-marketing/developers/
Cristiano: I started working on wam video
McCool: I think consistency would help a lot
... for example ending with the same slide
... and also it is better to follow the template
Daniel: we have a developers page on the WoT site
... there is some links to the material we have collected
McCool: I'd like to see a list of tutorials
... it might be better to have a dedicated section about
tutorials
Daniel: I think it is better to add this to the site and not to
Github
McCool: we can use Github as a staging/planning area then we
can add things to the site itself
Kaz: Toumura-san made some video about node-red and node-gen
Toumura: actually it was mainly for node-gen
<kaz> [18]Toumura-san's video
[18] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/blob/master/material/wot_nodegen_20200507.pptx
McCool: I think it is better to focus on node-red (in the
title)
... is it ok?
Toumura: ok
McCool: about thing description, daniel maybe you can create a
tutorial
... I have same material too
... it does not be complicated a voice over with powerpoint
slide should be fine
Cristiano: what is the working process?
McCool: this is a staging area where we collect raw material
and then it can be refined
... we should also add a dedicated page on the site. I propose
to rename developers tools to developer resources
... and add a tutorial section
... tutorial should be the first thing
... also I'd use the word tutorials in the short description
<dape>
[19]https://danielpeintner.github.io/wot-marketing/developers/
[19] https://danielpeintner.github.io/wot-marketing/developers/
McCool: do we need to create an issue?
Daniel: we are already working on that page, we may add this
feedback
McCool: again tutorials should be the first thing
Daniel: yeah I agree
McCool: I'd also change the Getting Started page to
Documentation
... I am creating an issue with this feedback
<McCool> [20]https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/79
[20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/79
McCool: Ok let's close the meeting
Kaz: the w3c logo is missing in some places, should I create an
issue about this?
McCool: please go ahead
McCool: the presentation template should also has the W3C logo
<kaz> [adjourned]
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
David Booth's [21]scribe.perl version ([22]CVS log)
$Date: 2020/09/01 15:25:05 $
[21] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[22] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 7 September 2020 07:58:31 UTC