W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-wg@w3.org > September 2020

[wot-discovery] minutes - 24 August 2020

From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 16:28:46 +0900
Message-ID: <87zh62kpu9.wl-ashimura@w3.org>
To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2020/08/24-wot-discovery-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Christian!

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                             WoT Discovery

24 Aug 2020

Attendees

   Present
          Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Andrea_Cimmino,
          Christian_Glomb, Christian_Kurze, Kunihiko_Toumura,
          Tomoaki_Mizushima, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Michael_Koster

   Regrets
          Farshid

   Chair
          McCool

   Scribe
          glomb

Contents

     * [2]Topics
         1. [3]Guests
         2. [4]Security and TD issues
         3. [5]wot-discovery PR review
         4. [6]Discovery use cases
         5. [7]AOB
     * [8]Summary of Action Items
     * [9]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

   <kaz> scribenick: glomb

Guests

   <inserted> McCool: Christian Kurze

Security and TD issues

   McCool: OAuth2 mentioning PR #181 from wot-security

   <kaz> [10]Issue 181

     [10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/181

   To be clarified there

wot-discovery PR review

   <inserted> [11]PR 49

     [11] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/49

   PR #49: Change and merge

   No objections for merging after change

   [12]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/47

     [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/47

   Andrea syncing with Farshid

   Text will be a bit simplified

   JSONpath and Xpath a MUST - Semantics OPTIONAL

   Refer to external documents instead of replicating info

   <kaz> [13]diff

     [13] https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/wot-discovery/47/5ff4fe9...AndreaCimminoArriaga:e56804b.html#jsonpath-semantic

   Andrea will update/rebase PR and then it will be merged

   JSONpath OR Xpath - which one should be mandatory

   JSONpath not a standard

   McCool: Define it on our own or encourage JSONpath colleagues

   <kaz> [14]https://github.com/json-path/JsonPath?

     [14] https://github.com/json-path/JsonPath

   Xpath a MUST ?

   First reach out to JSONpath colleagues

   <McCool> [15]https://goessner.net/articles/JsonPath/

     [15] https://goessner.net/articles/JsonPath/

   <kaz> [16]https://jsonpath.com

     [16] https://jsonpath.com/

   <scribe> New issue concerning this topic:
   [17]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/56

     [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/56

   SPARQL a MAY

   McCool: Syntactic vs. semantic discovery

   [18]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/51 -> wait for
   Farshid

     [18] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/51

   [19]https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/pull/33 -> "horizontal"
   discovery use case

     [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/pull/33

   McCool @all - please review

Discovery use cases

   Discovery use case in wot-usecases or wot-discovery

   Might be hard to find for people interested in discovery

   <kaz> [20]wot-architecture REQUIREMENTS area

     [20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/tree/master/REQUIREMENTS

   [21]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/57 addressing
   question where to host discovery requirements / horizontal +
   vertical use cases

     [21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/57

   To be discussed in next use case / architecture call September
   3rd

   TD templates - describing a class of devices

   instead of an instance

   Like in Eclipse Vorto

   To be included in discovery (directories)?

   Runtime discovery vs. development time discovery

   [22]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/58 for
   discussion

     [22] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/58

   <McCool> [23]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/58

     [23] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/58

   Instantiate from models, find instances belonging to a certain
   model ...

   Take a look at plugfest scenarios

   <kaz> [24]McCool's comment based on today's discussion

     [24] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/58#issuecomment-679178899

AOB

   scribenick: kaz

   <Zakim> kaz, you wanted to say maybe there'll be the
   architecture call on 27th according to
   [25]https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#Cancellatio
   ns

     [25] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#Cancellations

   McCool: in that case, we can talk about how to deal with
   requirements during that call

   [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    David Booth's [26]scribe.perl version ([27]CVS log)
    $Date: 2020/08/31 03:46:35 $

     [26] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [27] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 7 September 2020 07:28:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 7 September 2020 07:28:51 UTC