[wot-discovery] minutes - 30 March 2020

available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2020/03/30-wot-discovery-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Zoltan!

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                             WoT Discovery

30 Mar 2020

   [2]Agenda

      [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#30_Mar_2020

Attendees

   Present
          Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Kevin_Olotu, Zoltan_Kis,
          Chritian_Glomb, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Koster,
          Andrea_Cimmino

   Regrets

   Chair
          McCool

   Scribe
          zkis

Contents

     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]Agenda
         2. [5]Previous minutes
         3. [6]Pull request #4
         4. [7]Use cases
         5. [8]Issue#7
         6. [9]New issue about whether could a directory service
            support content negotiation and return metadata in
            different formats, e.g. Vorto, OpenAPI, WoT TD.
         7. [10]Check prvious actions again
     * [11]Summary of Action Items
     * [12]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

   <kaz> scribenick: zkis

Agenda

   <McCool>
   agenda:[13]https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebC
   onf#30_Mar_2020

     [13] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#30_Mar_2020

   MMc editing WG WoT Discovery wiki, guests: Kevin Olotu (Bosch)

   McCool: any objection against Kevin as guest?

   no objections

   McCool: today would like to follow up on the issues

Previous minutes

   [14]Mar-23 minutes

     [14] https://www.w3.org/2020/03/23-wot-discovery-minutes.html

   McCool: any objections on publishing the Agenda

   [no objections]

Pull request #4

   [15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/4

     [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/4

   McCool: I think we should limit the scope to metadata
   ... otherwise we could merge it

   Christian: so the proposal is to split the content to multiple
   files and link them?

   McCool: yes
   ... and then a README
   ... we could do that later, for now we can merge it

   Christian: I just proposed a template and tried to put the use
   cases in that
   ... nothing was changed, just reorganized

   McCool: any objections for merging?

   [no objections]

   Merged with a comment on how to follow up.

Use cases

   [16]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/tree/master/USE-CASES

     [16] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/tree/master/USE-CASES

   MMc editing, adding Scope

   McCool: limit discovery to metadata discovery

   MMc made PR #12

   [17]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/12

     [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/12

   McCool: will leave it open for a week for comments

Issue#7

   [18]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/7

     [18] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/7

   Kevin: two kinds of work, alignment of semantic terminology and
   how to do interoperability

   McCool: there is too much things for one issue.
   ... let's keep this issue for the first, i.e. alignment of
   semantic terminology and move the rest to a new issue

   Andrea: maybe we could explore automatic translation
   ... into a TD

   Koster: take things that are described by Vorto, define those
   in TD and add protocol bindings

   Andrea: but we don't have that translation today, right?

   Koster: we could create a TD template and add the protocol
   binding information
   ... there are 2 things, the information model and bindings

   Andrea: finding the translation is the challenge

   McCool: bidirectional translation, even

   MMc is creating a new issue for Vorto interoperability

   [19]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/13

     [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/13

   McCool: assigning issue#7 to Kevin
   ... this is more like a TD issue
   ... didn't work, assigning it to Michael Koster

New issue about whether could a directory service support content
negotiation and return metadata in different formats, e.g. Vorto,
OpenAPI, WoT TD.

   [20]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/14

     [20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/14

   Koster: the question is how are we going to use it for
   discovery searches

   McCool: is this suitable scope for you Kevin?

   Kevin: yes

Check previous actions again

   <kaz> [21]Mar23 minutes

     [21] https://www.w3.org/2020/03/23-wot-discovery-minutes.html

   McCool: capturing issues from past minutes
   ... creating a docker container for node-wot, could we create
   an issue in node-wot?
   ... Kaz, please fix the typo for doc->docker

   Koster: for management API, we could define a TD

   <kaz> [fixed]

   <McCool> mm: "doc" should be "docker" in minutes

   McCool: CG please create an issue in node-wot

   [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    David Booth's [22]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([23]CVS log)
    $Date: 2020/04/01 09:39:40 $

     [22] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2020 10:12:39 UTC