W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-wg@w3.org > August 2018

[PlugFest/Test] minutes - 22 August 2018

From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:51:22 +0900
Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9WA0K6nj5cnD59J9OoTzN5cbhuUexqCmvVWDdFCgP-5=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2018/08/22-wot-pf-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks,

Kazuyuki

---

   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                           WoT PlugFest/Test

22 Aug 2018

   [2]Agenda

      [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/PlugFest_WebConf#Agenda

Attendees

   Present
          Michael_Lagally, Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool,
          Tomoaki_Mizushima, Toru_Kawaguchi, Sebastian_Kaebisch,
          Kunihiko_Toumura, DarkoAnicic

   Regrets

   Chair
          McCool

   Scribe
          kaz

Contents

     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]Online PlugFest
         2. [5]Testing
         3. [6]Action for the next call
     * [7]Summary of Action Items
     * [8]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

   <scribe> scribenick: kaz

Online PlugFest

   McCool: several PRs

   [9]PRs

      [9] https://github.com/w3c/wot/pulls

   [10]PR 527 - Preparation doc by Intel

     [10] https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/527

   McCool: to be merged

   (and merged now)

   [11]PR 519 - converter fixes, revised Festo-Simulator TD

     [11] https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/519

   Kaz: related to the Bundang f2f?

   McCool: combined content
   ... Bundang report and new scenario proposal
   ... (merged it)
   ... one more PR by Soumya

   [12]PR 506 by Soumya

     [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/506

   [13]Online PlugFest prep. doc

     [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/plugfest/2018-sept-online

   [14]preparation-Intel.md

     [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/plugfest/2018-sept-online/preparation-intel.md

   McCool: would like to contribute to the network setting
   ... 2 Thing Directories, one OAuth server
   ... also VLAN servers
   ... all the machines can join one specific network
   ... also will work to make local network secure
   ... 1.2 Public Proxies
   ... authentication available
   ... OCF service, camera service, speech service, etc.
   ... 1.3 Public Tools
   ... don't have to recreate accounts
   ... two paths: W3C and GitHub
   ... hoping to enable that
   ... btw, which GH group/repo includes everybody?
   ... w3c/wot?

   Kaz: w3c/wot should be the largest one
   ... but not sure if everybody is included
   ... maybe we can create a specific repo and/or team for
   plugfest effort

   McCool: ok
   ... authentication information should be distributed via W3C
   email and/or use OAuth2
   ... and validation service
   ... 2. Participants and Servients
   ... information on Intel servients
   ... 3. Checking points for the next plugfest
   ... 3.1, 3.2, ...
   ... what kind of eventing model to be used?
   ... e.g., HTTP+Webhooks

   <mlagally> ML: have HTTP+Webhooks on my todo list

   McCool: 3.2.7 Security
   ... last time: basic and digest
   ... would work on oauth2 and apikey as well
   ... for CoAPS: psk cert, public
   ... maybe we need some mechanism to handle HTTPS local for
   HTTPS-based connection
   ... hopefully node-wot would be updated to work with CoAPS
   ... 4. Use Cases
   ... don't have use cases yet
   ... 5. Requirements for PlugFest Environment
   ... any questions?

   Kaz: we can start with technical topics and existing/expected
   servients
   ... and during or after the online plugfest, we can think about
   integrated use cases and scenarios

   McCool: right
   ... we can concentrate on technical features for the online
   plugfest
   ... and think about usecase scenarios for TPAC later
   ... Lagally has some use case scenarios here

   Lagally: best to show industry adaption
   ... many people are interested and look at W3C work
   ... it is important to show integration among different
   companies to other interested parties

   [15]Scenarios

     [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/plugfest/2018-sept-online#user-content-scenarios

   Koster: we need invent some subprotocol for websocket
   ... also strong need for webgook
   ... and patterns for actions
   ... TD fragment media-type
   ... action/event description
   ... plug existing pattern
   ... also uri template
   ... handling multiple events
   ... can write up those features

   McCool: we can have a list

   Koster: we should have that at the main call

   McCool: you have write access to this repo. right?
   ... please add new features here at "Goals" section

   Koster: fine

   Kaz: btw, the current topics within the "Goals" section are
   actually "Target features"

   McCool: can make it a subsection of "Goals" section and make it
   "Target Features" subsection

   Kaz: good

   McCool: (also adds "Out of Scope Features" subsection to the
   "Goals" section)

   Kaz: good

   McCool: any other comments?

   Lagally: good

   McCool: two scenarios here
   ... home integration and industrial integration
   ... could classify the latter into several subsections?

   Lagally: what do you mean?

   McCool: maybe could add "Enterprise integration scenario"?
   ... just a proposal

   Kaz: do you want to categorize those possible use case scenario
   based on the security viewpoint?

   McCool: one or several aspects

   Lagally: when I generated those use case scenarios, I was
   thinking about what we could do using the existing modules
   generated by the current participants

   Kaz: maybe it would be easier to understand if we simply think
   about several possible modes for each use case scenario?
   ... e.g., free-mode vs. enterprise-mode

   <mlagally> for the markdown table try the following syntax:

   <mlagally> | Left Aligned | Center Aligned | Right Aligned |
   |:------------- |:---------------:| -------------:|
   | col 3 is | some wordy text | $1600 |
   | col 2 is | centered | $12 |
   | zebra stripes | are neat | $1 |

   Toru: question about the authorization server
   ... what would be the procedure?

   McCool: can provide a reverse proxy and an OAuth server
   ... need to investigate the GH server as well
   ... would like to put the information together as a one pager

   Toru: would be appreciate if you could document that

   McCool: will do HTTPS stuff first
   ... and then CoAP and MQTT

Testing

   McCool: updated the testing plan
   ... let's discuss the detail next week

Action for the next call

   McCool: the number one task for everybody is generating a
   preparation-YOU.md file under plugfest/2018-sept-online for the
   next call

   [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [16]scribe.perl version
    1.152 ([17]CVS log)
    $Date: 2018/08/22 15:49:02 $

     [16] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2018 15:52:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 22 August 2018 15:52:30 UTC