- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 01:35:44 +0900
- To: public-wot-wg@w3.org, Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
available at: https://www.w3.org/2018/08/08-wot-pf-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking these minutes, Kawaguchi-san! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - WoT PlugFest/Testing 08 Aug 2018 Attendees Present Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Daniel_Peintner, Kunihiko_Toumura, Ryuichi_Matsukura, Takeshi_Sano, Toru_Kawaguchi, Matthias_Kovatsch Regrets Chair McCool Scribe Toru Contents * [2]Topics 1. [3]Agenda 2. [4]Bundang Plugfest review 3. [5]Plugfest goals and logistics 4. [6]Testing plan 5. [7]AOB * [8]Summary of Action Items * [9]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ Agenda <McCool> [10]https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/PlugFest_WebConf#Agenda_08.0 8.2018 [10] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/PlugFest_WebConf#Agenda_08.08.2018 <kaz> scribenick: kawaguch <kaz> scribe: Toru McCool: Agenda ... quick update ... Review from Bundang Plugfest ... Next Plugfest Bundang Plugfest review McCool: Update from Fujitsu? <kaz> [11]plugfest reports [11] https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/plugfest/2018-bundang Matthias: Siemens result <kaz> [12]Siemens results [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/plugfest/2018-bundang/result-siemens.md Matthias: had machine capability issue on directory ... Property handling should be splited into three cases ... read/write/observe ... Node WoT hasn't implemented observe property yet ... after two weeks at IETF hackathon some additional products were tested Plugfest goals and logistics McCool: Added Online and Lyon to GitHub repo [13]https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/plugfest [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/plugfest Matthias: Will provide initial preparation template McCool: Online plugfest at late September ... Work 4 weeks to identify what to test ... One thing is security schemes ... New protocol binding features ... including actions and event descriptions ... event splitting into input and output data ... Logistics ... Next week is vacation in Japan ... Want to create VPN and Virtual NAT ... to simulate what we do locally ... Will provide OAuth server ... Other thing? Matthias: WebEx coordinate ... Or alternative video stream such as Hangout McCool: For safety will have both Matthias: Hangout has good quality ... but maybe has some restriction on number of participants McCool: What will Panasonic provide? Kawaguchi: Online simulator as already provided McCool: add documentation under online plugfest ... Thing directory services and proxy services on cloud will be provided ... For cloud version of thing directory I will use authentication ... under documentation there will also be preparation template ... and result template ... Another section is validation and testing ... We will have TD validation tool and network testing tool ... Also security validation Kaz: Under Goals section there should be also scenario McCool: add Scripting API to Validation Matthias: Also semantic validation in TD McCool: Let's continue discussion. Please make PR Testing plan <McCool> [14]https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/testing/plan.md [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/testing/plan.md McCool: Please read and comment ... TD testing template is under preparation ... Scripting and Binding are currently broken ... 5 steps for TD validation ... 1. JSON file ... 2. JSON Schema ... 3. Semantic checking ... 4. Validation against OWL ... 5. Special case test ... One addition to network interface testing is Fuzz testing ... Generates random garbage input ... such as thousand-nested JSON file ... partly robustness, partly security testing <kaz> [15]Scapy [15] https://scapy.net/ McCool: Tools can be found, but Ege's tools may be also extended ... Security testing ... added new description about positive and negative testing ... negative testing is to check vulnerability ... also added descriptions per protocols ... such as HTTP, CoAP, MQTT ... For CoAP small set of schemes will be tested ... For MQTT there is no standard ... session resumptions ... not all brokers support all versions ... need to identify typical use ... some parameters might be indicated by protocol binding ... Any input to DTLS or MQTT testing? <inserted> Kaz: we should ask people to try those security approaches (DTLS, MQTTS, CoAPS, etc.) McCool: At next plugfest everybody should implement security ... Will try to make MQTTs broker running <McCool> [16]https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7252#section-9.1 [16] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7252#section-9.1 McCool: Section about security in CoAP ... DTLS is recommended ... There's a pre-shared key ... Also raw public key ... Also keys and cert mode ... One issue is cipher suite ... Need to check newest version AOB <Zakim> kaz, you wanted to ask about result-intel.md (sorry just noticed) Kaz: result-intel.md? McCool: will update eventually <kaz> [adjourned] Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.152 ([18]CVS log) $Date: 2018/08/09 16:31:23 $ [17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2018 16:36:56 UTC