AW: AW: Some comments on editor's drafts

Hi Kjetil,

> So, how about the other things, e.g. the typed links for discovery and
> the clarification on how to transform RDF triples using the TD and the
> data from the microcontroller, is that something I should register as
> issues on github?

there is a task force about  Linked Data and Semantic Processing [1]. This might be a good match for you concerns. Feel free to join the discussion [2]!

If you think certain things are not covered you can create issues with "[TF-LD]" prefix in [3].

Hope this helps,

-- Daniel

[1] https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/TF-LD_charter.md
[2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/IG_Linked_Data_and_Semantic_Processing_WebConf
[3] https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues



________________________________
Von: Kjetil Kjernsmo [kjetil@kjernsmo.net]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. März 2017 23:56
An: public-wot-wg@w3.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Some comments on editor's drafts


Hello again!



On Wednesday 15. March 2017 09.59.40 Peintner, Daniel wrote:

> Thanks for your feedback and good luck for building your own smart house



Thank you very much! :-)





> The plan is to create a dedicated specification for 'Web of Things (WoT)

> Thing Description' [1].

>

> Having said that, I think it makes perfect sense to keep the afore

> mentioned specification crisp while the Current Practices document [2]

> may contain lots of examples (similar to what people often call a

> Primer).



Right, that sounds good! I didn't realize the Current Practices was intended to be maintained further, but it makes sense!



So, how about the other things, e.g. the typed links for discovery and the clarification on how to transform RDF triples using the TD and the data from the microcontroller, is that something I should register as issues on github?



Cheers,



Kjetil