- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:45:05 +0900
- To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at: https://www.w3.org/2021/09/14-wot-marketing-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Philipp! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] https://www.w3.org/ WoT Marketing 14 September 2021 [2]Agenda. [3]IRC log. [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Marketing_WebConf#Sept_14.2C_2021 [3] https://www.w3.org/2021/09/14-wot-marketing-irc Attendees Present Daniel_Peintner, Fady_Salama, Jan_Romann, Kaz_Ashimura, Philipp_Blum, Sebastian_Kaebisch, Toamoaki_Mizushima Regrets - Chair Sebastian Scribe citrullin, kaz Contents 1. [4]Minute review 2. [5]New moderation 3. [6]Web of Things webpage 4. [7]TUM explainer videos 5. [8]Contact information. Meeting minutes Minute review <kaz> [9]Sep-7 [9] https://www.w3.org/2021/09/07-wot-marketing-minutes.html Sebastian: We should discuss, if we can bring the logos on the website. There are some rules from the W3C regarding that. … any objections? Minutes are getting published. New moderation Sebastian: The new year at Siemens starts and since I also work in the other tasks forces, I will not have enough time for the marketing taskforce anymore. … I asked Fady, if he has time for this. Fady is kind of the successor of Ege. … Fady would be fine doing it. Even though, this is open. So, if anyone is interested, please go ahead. Daniel: Maybe we should ask in the whole group, not only in the task force. <Mizushima> +1 Sebastian: Maybe we should make this announcement in the main call. citrullin +1 <dape> +1 Web of Things webpage [10]add text and link to events [10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/200 Sebastian: Any objections to merge the PR? no objections, PR gets merged. Sebastian: Anything else we should update on the website? Sebastian: The F2F dates are wrong. Daniel: I can fix that right away. <kaz> [11]vF2F wiki [11] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2021 Daniel: Updated the dates. It takes some minutes to update on the website. Sebastian: Ege is not here, but I can write him to create one tweet Daniel: I updated the video section. Sebastian: I haven't seen the introduction title first. Is it just me? Is there another way we can make it more clear that this is a category? Daniel: We could use tabs for it. … what might help is to have a little more space in between. Sebastian: The resolution of this preview image (TPAC 2020) is not great. Maybe can change that. Daniel: I can change this. Maybe I can also add a gray border to make it clearer. Sebastian: I will ping Ege regarding the tweet of the plugfest. TUM explainer videos <kaz> [12]Issue 194 - Adding simple WoT introduction video (and reorganize video ordering) [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/194 Sebastian: Fady, do you have an update on it? Fady: We are working on this and can give you an update on it this month. Sebastian: Philipp, do you have an update? Philipp: No, I am working on the documentation. Sebastian: I would like to have the introduction video by TUM on the website. [13]TUM introduction video [13] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lt_P2BU8e3I wondering about the order of our videos... Kaz: We can put them into some categories. Also we can simply sort the videos by year instead. Sebastian: We can put up the tutorials first and have the interview in another section below it. Philipp: I agree on this. The tutorials are way more important. Daniel: I still suggest to have them orderd by date. Sebastian: Yes, that makes sense. Sebastian adds a comment to issue 194. [14]issue 194 in wot-marketing [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/194 Kaz: I agree with Daniel to sort it by date. Kaz: We could add the tutorials to the developer section. Sebastian: Let's revisit this topic when fady and ege have their tutorial series ready. Kaz: ok. there are 3 possible pages at the moment, Developers, Documentation and Videos. Daniel: The intro text in the developer section is a bit weird. Sebastian: You are right. I am also not happy with it. Daniel: I can just remove it. Sebastian: Okay. Contact information. Daniel: We have pointer to the spec, but no contact information. Daniel: We had a long discussion about matrix, github, discord etc. Philipp: As I remember the conclusion was, for now, to just use Github. Sebastian: Github has this new feature for discussions. Daniel: If we would activate it, I would only activate it on one page. … this looks very similar to github issues. +1 on only have one discussion page. Philipp: I am with daniel on this. Only one discussion page. For now, github discussion is probably fine. Sebastian: We also have Stackoverflow. Should we link it as well? Philipp: Since most of our activities are already on github, github is probably the better way to go, for now. Daniel: That is a topic for the main call. Sebastian adds a comment to issue 192 [15]issue 192 [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/192 <kaz> [adjourned] Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by [16]scribe.perl version 136 (Thu May 27 13:50:24 2021 UTC). [16] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Monday, 27 September 2021 02:45:11 UTC