- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:45:05 +0900
- To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2021/09/14-wot-marketing-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Philipp!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] https://www.w3.org/
WoT Marketing
14 September 2021
[2]Agenda. [3]IRC log.
[2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Marketing_WebConf#Sept_14.2C_2021
[3] https://www.w3.org/2021/09/14-wot-marketing-irc
Attendees
Present
Daniel_Peintner, Fady_Salama, Jan_Romann, Kaz_Ashimura,
Philipp_Blum, Sebastian_Kaebisch, Toamoaki_Mizushima
Regrets
-
Chair
Sebastian
Scribe
citrullin, kaz
Contents
1. [4]Minute review
2. [5]New moderation
3. [6]Web of Things webpage
4. [7]TUM explainer videos
5. [8]Contact information.
Meeting minutes
Minute review
<kaz> [9]Sep-7
[9] https://www.w3.org/2021/09/07-wot-marketing-minutes.html
Sebastian: We should discuss, if we can bring the logos on the
website. There are some rules from the W3C regarding that.
… any objections?
Minutes are getting published.
New moderation
Sebastian: The new year at Siemens starts and since I also work
in the other tasks forces, I will not have enough time for the
marketing taskforce anymore.
… I asked Fady, if he has time for this. Fady is kind of the
successor of Ege.
… Fady would be fine doing it. Even though, this is open. So,
if anyone is interested, please go ahead.
Daniel: Maybe we should ask in the whole group, not only in the
task force.
<Mizushima> +1
Sebastian: Maybe we should make this announcement in the main
call.
citrullin +1
<dape> +1
Web of Things webpage
[10]add text and link to events
[10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/200
Sebastian: Any objections to merge the PR?
no objections, PR gets merged.
Sebastian: Anything else we should update on the website?
Sebastian: The F2F dates are wrong.
Daniel: I can fix that right away.
<kaz> [11]vF2F wiki
[11] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2021
Daniel: Updated the dates. It takes some minutes to update on
the website.
Sebastian: Ege is not here, but I can write him to create one
tweet
Daniel: I updated the video section.
Sebastian: I haven't seen the introduction title first. Is it
just me? Is there another way we can make it more clear that
this is a category?
Daniel: We could use tabs for it.
… what might help is to have a little more space in between.
Sebastian: The resolution of this preview image (TPAC 2020) is
not great. Maybe can change that.
Daniel: I can change this. Maybe I can also add a gray border
to make it clearer.
Sebastian: I will ping Ege regarding the tweet of the plugfest.
TUM explainer videos
<kaz> [12]Issue 194 - Adding simple WoT introduction video (and
reorganize video ordering)
[12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/194
Sebastian: Fady, do you have an update on it?
Fady: We are working on this and can give you an update on it
this month.
Sebastian: Philipp, do you have an update?
Philipp: No, I am working on the documentation.
Sebastian: I would like to have the introduction video by TUM
on the website.
[13]TUM introduction video
[13] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lt_P2BU8e3I
wondering about the order of our videos...
Kaz: We can put them into some categories. Also we can simply
sort the videos by year instead.
Sebastian: We can put up the tutorials first and have the
interview in another section below it.
Philipp: I agree on this. The tutorials are way more important.
Daniel: I still suggest to have them orderd by date.
Sebastian: Yes, that makes sense.
Sebastian adds a comment to issue 194.
[14]issue 194 in wot-marketing
[14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/194
Kaz: I agree with Daniel to sort it by date.
Kaz: We could add the tutorials to the developer section.
Sebastian: Let's revisit this topic when fady and ege have
their tutorial series ready.
Kaz: ok. there are 3 possible pages at the moment, Developers,
Documentation and Videos.
Daniel: The intro text in the developer section is a bit weird.
Sebastian: You are right. I am also not happy with it.
Daniel: I can just remove it.
Sebastian: Okay.
Contact information.
Daniel: We have pointer to the spec, but no contact
information.
Daniel: We had a long discussion about matrix, github, discord
etc.
Philipp: As I remember the conclusion was, for now, to just use
Github.
Sebastian: Github has this new feature for discussions.
Daniel: If we would activate it, I would only activate it on
one page.
… this looks very similar to github issues.
+1 on only have one discussion page.
Philipp: I am with daniel on this. Only one discussion page.
For now, github discussion is probably fine.
Sebastian: We also have Stackoverflow. Should we link it as
well?
Philipp: Since most of our activities are already on github,
github is probably the better way to go, for now.
Daniel: That is a topic for the main call.
Sebastian adds a comment to issue 192
[15]issue 192
[15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/192
<kaz> [adjourned]
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
[16]scribe.perl version 136 (Thu May 27 13:50:24 2021 UTC).
[16] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Monday, 27 September 2021 02:45:11 UTC