- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 18:20:05 +0900
- To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
availabl at: https://www.w3.org/2021/04/12-wot-sec-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Elena! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] https://www.w3.org/ WoT Security 12 April 2021 [2]IRC log. [2] https://www.w3.org/2021/04/12-wot-sec-irc Attendees Present Elena_Reshetova, Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCol, Philipp_Blum, Tomoaki_Mizushima Regrets - Chair McCool Scribe elena Contents 1. [3]minutes from March 8 2. [4]PR 1086 for TD canonicalization 3. [5]issues Meeting minutes minutes from March 8 [6]March-8 [6] https://www.w3.org/2021/03/08-wot-sec-minutes.html <citrullin> Michael, you are not in the call anymore minutes accepted PR 1086 for TD canonicalization <kaz> [7]PR 1086 [7] https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1086 issues <McCool> [8]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/194 wot-security Issue 194 - Provide guidance on use of OAuth 2 flows [8] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/194 <McCool> [9]-> [9] https://w3c.github.io/wot-usecases/#oauth McCool: what is the good location for this text? It is currently in use cases <kaz> s/#oauth|#oauth WoT Use Cases Editor's draft - 5.7.1 OAuth2 Flows| Philipp: is it the intention of best practices only for recommendation or as must? McCool: Best Practices are suggestions, but if you want to satisfy a profile, they would be normative McCool: profiles are normative, so we have to do a capital must McCool: but we might have to copy assertions to normative profile doc McCool: what should our recommendations be? McCool puts possible recommendations to the issue comment these recommendations should part of security best practices doc McCool: can anyone volunteer to extract the relevant parts and move it to the Best Practices doc? McCool: we still have to decide if we publish Best Practices separately Philipp volunteers McCool: object security, issue 185, putting a comment [10]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/185 [10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/185 McCool: do you have any examples where you would want to use object security? <citrullin> Sorry, I got a package McCool: somebody needs to think about object security McCool mentions Ben in the issue comment, maybe Ben can also take a look on this McCool: next issue is PR [11]https://github.com/w3c/ wot-thing-description/pull/1058 [11] https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1058 <citrullin> I wanted to take a look into signing objects. Combining it it with DIDs and a DLT (Hyperledger for example). Taking a look into WebThings is a good idea. Will do that in the future. McCool: this should be ok and hopefully merged soon McCool: PR [12]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/196 still has some confusion between DoS and DDoS [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/196 McCool puts a comment there Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by [13]scribe.perl version 127 (Wed Dec 30 17:39:58 2020 UTC). [13] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Monday, 24 May 2021 09:20:11 UTC