[PlugFest/Testing] minutes - 11 November 2020

available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2020/11/11-wot-pf-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Cristiano!

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                          WoT PlugFest/Testing

11 Nov 2020

Attendees

   Present
          Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Cristiano_Aguzzi,
          Daniel_Peintner, Ege_Korkan, Kunihiko_Toumura,
          Tomoaki_Mizushima

   Regrets

   Chair
          McCool

   Scribe
          cris

Contents

     * [2]Topics
         1. [3]Minutes review
         2. [4]Node-RED integration
         3. [5]TV testing framework
         4. [6]open issues
     * [7]Summary of Action Items
     * [8]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

Minutes review

   <kaz> [9]https://www.w3.org/2020/10/02-wot-pf-minutes.html

      [9] https://www.w3.org/2020/10/02-wot-pf-minutes.html

   <inserted> scribenick: cris

   Kaz: we may need to review the minutes from Oct 2 plugfest

   McCool: ok
   ... I remember Rob Smith, I noticed his affiliation is in the
   contracted from. Could you please expand it?

   Kaz: sure.

   McCool: ok, any other comments?
   ... minutes approved
   ... do you want me to review any part of the minutes from the
   TPAC meeting?

   Kaz: yes, please

   <kaz> [10]vF2F minutes

     [10] https://www.w3.org/2020/10/05-22-wot-minutes.html

   McCool: any objections to publish it?
   ... ok, let's mark number 8 as reviewed

Node-RED integration

   McCool: toumura-san we saw your prototype during the plug fest.
   What is the plan to make all this stuff avaible to other
   people?

   Toumura: we are thinking about how to make the code opensource
   ... there's also some technical limitations we Node RED. in
   particular, we are looking to Node RED plugins

   McCool: kaz, do think the smart cities workshop will be in
   March?

   Kaz: I've started to think about April but let's see within the
   Program Committee

   McCool: I like Node-RED demo, I think it convey good value to
   WoT
   ... we should plan a showcase for it soon
   ... toumura-san, please keep us updated.

TV testing framework

   <kaz> kaz: Louay Bassbouss from Fraunhofer is working TV
   browser testing within the CTA WAVE project

   <kaz> ... would be useful for the WoT Testing work too

   McCool: I think it is interesting, it would be nice to invite
   him to the PlugFest call
   ... anything else?

open issues

   McCool: regarding the PlugFest I added link to the breakout
   presentation
   ... do we have anything else on the major accomplishment of the
   last plugfest?

   Ege: I think we could close it and add a label

   McCool: ok, it might be harder to find if it stays closed, but
   let's see

   <inserted> [11]Issue 76

     [11] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/76

   McCool: I'll leave #76 open to discuss with OGC group
   ... also I labeled it to keep track of the related issues.

   <inserted> [12]Issue 71

     [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/71

   McCool: #71 is a TODO
   ... it is about testing TDD thing description with node-wot.
   ... someone should volunteer to do this
   ... I'm cross-referencing this issue in the node-wot repo
   ... also I'm labelling the issue with a new lable for node-wot
   ... consequently, I'm adding also a node-red label
   ... we do not fulfilled #63 issue.

   <inserted> [13]Issue 63

     [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/63

   McCool: do you have the link for APA meeting minutes? we
   probably talked about #63

   <kaz> [14]https://www.w3.org/2020/10/05-22-wot-minutes.html#apa

     [14] https://www.w3.org/2020/10/05-22-wot-minutes.html#apa

   McCool: we have a couple of issues tagged with geolocation. I
   think we should start to plan a meeting with them
   ... still a bunch of work to do on tools
   ... Please take a look to geolocation tagged issues. we'll
   discuss them in the planned meeting with Spatial Data on the
   Web IG.

   <kaz> i|please take|[15]Issue 87|

     [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/87

   McCool: there's a interesting discussion on issue 87
   ... alternate it is a little vague

   Cristiano: I agree

   McCool: If we going to propose a new link type we have to go
   through IANA procedure

   Ege: Usually, link types have a little paragraph to explain
   their purposes

   <kaz> [16]IANA Link Relation Types

     [16] https://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml

   Ege: btw which task force regulate this IANA link types?

   McCool: we should talk with the TD task force

   Ege: alternate is good for html

   Cristiano: yes, I mentioned this in the comment

   McCool: we have a document for link type proposals, it should
   be in the use-case repo

   Cristiano: I've just remembered that I edited a document in the
   arch repo

   <kaz> [17]wot-architecture PR 562

     [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/pull/562

   McCool: Ok so please add link types in the document linked. In
   the end, I think they will be listed in the TD document

   <kaz> [18]updated comment on wot-testing Issue 87

     [18] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/87#issuecomment-725470867

   <kaz> [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    David Booth's [19]scribe.perl version ([20]CVS log)
    $Date: 2020/12/02 09:19:13 $

     [19] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [20] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2020 09:21:03 UTC