[Online PlugFest] minutes - Day 5, 2 October 2020

available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2020/10/02-wot-pf-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Cristiano!

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                      WoT online PlugFest - Day 5

02 Oct 2020

Attendees

   Present
          Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Daniel_Peintner,
          Hiroki_Endo, Hiroshi_Fujisawa, Kunihiko_Toumura,
          Philipp_Blum, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Sebastian_Kaebisch,
          Ege_Korkan, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Ryuichi_Matsukura

   Regrets

   Chair
          McCool

   Scribe
          cris, kaz

Contents

     * [2]Topics
         1. [3]Guest
         2. [4]Previous minutes
         3. [5]Updates
         4. [6]vF2F planning
         5. [7]NHK video
         6. [8]PR 89 by Hitachi
         7. [9]PR 90
         8. [10]PlugFest outcomes
     * [11]Summary of Action Items
     * [12]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

Guest

   <inserted> scribenick: cris

   McCool: any guest other than Philipp Blum from RIOT OS?

   Kaz: there's Hiroshi Fujisawa from NHK

   McCool: ok noted

Previous minutes

   McCool: I noticed that Hiroshi was here also yesterday. I need
   to note that in the agenda
   ... Rob Smith from Away Team Software might follow up about
   geolocation
   ... any objection to publish the minutes?
   ... ok accepted

Updates

   McCool: we are going to document a set a link relation types
   ... we have a document in wot-architecture repo
   ... I'll add the link in agenda
   ... please if you have a proposal for link relation types use
   that md file
   ... in the end I image to have a dedicated section in Thing
   Description spec

   Sebastian: what do you expect? we already have a section for
   links

   McCool: yeah but we don't provide any example for relation
   types

   Sebastian: ok

vF2F planning

   McCool: I have a quick update about F2F

   <kaz> [13]vF2F wiki

     [13] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2020#Timetable_for_WoT_PlugFest_and_vF2F_during_TPAC

   McCool: we defined an agenda for f2f
   ... however we didn't schedule a slot for plugfest report
   ... we could squish down security

   Sebastian: I think it is better to have PF report at the very
   beginning of the F2F
   ... if we can't. we could do it in the first testing call

   McCool: the problem is that the first call is far. Therefore,
   we have to do some work and write down in the issue tracker
   what we have done.

   Sebastian: I agree

   McCool: yeah the problem is that everything in the F2F is
   pretty packed.
   ... I'd record everything today, I think it is the best option.

   Kaz: it is ok to record the problems using GitHub Issues. But
   we should still make brief report out during the vF2F as well.

   McCool: Right. What I am planning to do it is just mention that
   we noted the outcomes in the issue on the testing report
   ... I'll schedule a time slot
   ... Ege could you do this report?

   Ege: I am not sure

   McCool: I'll do it don't worry
   ... any other updates?

NHK video

   McCool: could you please finish your demo? yesterday we had
   some connection issues

   Endo: we created a PR yesterday.

   <kaz> [14]PR 88

     [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/pull/88

   McCool: ok you updated the readme and uploaded pictures/videos

   <kaz> [15]updated README.md by NHK

     [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/tree/master/events/2020.09.Online/TDs/NHK

   Endo: we added node-red screenshots. where you can see our
   contribution highlighted

   McCool: thanks it is interesting
   ... can we see the video?

   Endo: sure, it's a short video: 20 second

   McCool: really nice video
   ... and use case
   ... thanks also for the screenshots!

   Sebastian: thank you also from my side! It is nice to see
   different things from other contributors

PR 89 by Hitachi

   McCool: let's go to the next PR
   ... PR #89 from Toumura-san
   ... it is a really nice contribution

   Sebastian: yes indeed

   McCool: once we have semantics you could organize nodes in
   node-red.
   ... about the limitation (authorization not supported). we are
   going to require authentication in TDD and in the future we
   should solve this issue
   ... probably we should add an issue in your repository.

   Toumura: we still don't have a public repository

   McCool: it's nice that you also provided slides and video

   <kaz> [16]resource on Hitachi's prototype implementation of
   nodegen autopopulation server including the Powerpoint video

     [16] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/tree/master/events/2020.09.Online/prototypes/Hitachi

   McCool: David might be interested in this work too
   ... the story here it is that with node-red you can do IoT
   orchestration in less in 30 sec. it is awesome

   Sebastian: where are TDs stored?

   Toumura: the server has a DB populated with mDNS

   McCool: mDNS is one discovery method, in the future the work
   from the discovery task force might help

   Kaz: I suggest we raise GitHub issues to let us track the
   results. Also we might want to put together a PlugFest
   guideline based on all the accomplishments from the PlugFest
   this time.

   <McCool> [17]https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/92

     [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/92

PR 90

   McCool: we have one more PR #90

   <inserted> scribenick: kaz

   <inserted> [18]PR 90

     [18] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/pull/90

   Cristiano: TD for a sprinkler

   McCool: every 20 seconds, you get data from the sensor

   Cristiano: yes

   McCool: would merge the PR and also raise an issue for the
   accomplishment
   ... (adds Farm/TUM mashup in addition to NHK and Node-red
   discovery integration)

   <inserted> scribenick: cris

   McCool: we could evolve this in an example

PlugFest outcomes

   <kaz> [19]Issue 76

     [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/76

   McCool: I'm marking Map visualization as outcome.

   <kaz> [20]Issue 71

     [20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/71

   McCool: about expirementation with TDD and node-wot. did we do
   that?

   Cristiano: no I didn't

   McCool: yeah we have to make sure that we have compatible
   implementations
   ... Ok I marked as a followup

   <inserted> [21]Issue 87

     [21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/87

   McCool: issue 87 is also a follow up

   <inserted> [22]Issue 91

     [22] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/91

   McCool: issue 91 is more related to marketing
   ... about community building we are still working on it.
   ... Philip do you want to speak about it?

   Philipp: I just added my view as outsider of the group

   Sebastian: thank you for point this out. you are not the only
   one.
   ... we are doing our best to solve this issue
   ... we have also a new landing page
   ... there is a developer space

   <dape> see [23]https://w3c.github.io/wot-marketing/

     [23] https://w3c.github.io/wot-marketing/

   Sebastian: it is still under discussion

   <dape> some more planned updates, see
   [24]https://danielpeintner.github.io/wot-marketing/

     [24] https://danielpeintner.github.io/wot-marketing/

   Philipp: this is why I mentioned about doing outside the w3c.
   it is more reactive

   Ege: json schema have a tag on stackoverflow
   ... also other wg created outside communities

   McCool: we also have a lot of material but we need to organize
   it

   Kaz: let's move the discussion to the marketing call
   ... and find some possible solutions.

   McCool: (adds "PlugFest Outcome" label and "Plugfest Followup"
   label to the GitHub Issues from the online PlugFest)

   <kaz> [25]Issue 60

     [25] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/60

   Daniel: could you please link issue 76 in 60?

   McCool: sure
   ... btw, we are getting out of time..

   <kaz> [26]updated comment for issue 60

     [26] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/60#issuecomment-702752607

   <kaz> [27]Issue 61

     [27] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/61

   <kaz> [28]comment added to Issue 61

     [28] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/61#issuecomment-702753694

   <kaz> [29]Issue 62

     [29] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/62

   <kaz> [30]comment added to Issue 62

     [30] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/62#issuecomment-702754206

   <kaz> [31]Issue 47 on scenario for OneDM

     [31] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/47

   <kaz> [32]comment added to Issue 47

     [32] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/47#issuecomment-700684224

   <kaz> ("Plugfest Outcome" label and "Plugfest Followup" label
   also added)

   <kaz> [33]Issue 58 on geolocation annotation

     [33] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/58

   <kaz> ("Plugfest Outcome" label and "Plugfest Followup" label
   also added)

   McCool: take your time to review the issues that we marked
   today
   ... we are going to discuss them in the vF2F

   <kaz> [34]Issue 92 on consolidated accomplishments

     [34] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/92

   McCool: cris can you make a screenshot of your mashup?

   Cristiano: sure I'll probably make a video

   McCool: it was a great PlugFest, thank you everybody

   Kaz: And thank you, Michael, for you efforts as well :)

   Sebastian: thank you everyone you did great!

   [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    David Booth's [35]scribe.perl version ([36]CVS log)
    $Date: 2020/12/02 09:16:36 $

     [35] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [36] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2020 09:17:56 UTC