- From: Mccool, Michael <michael.mccool@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:05:47 +0000
- To: "Hund, Johannes" <johannes.hund@siemens.com>
- CC: Michael Koster <michael.koster@smartthings.com>, Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
This is very useful. The other container format I have seen (and used) is snaps, which looks to be a little more lightweight than docker. Officially supporting at least one of these two in node-wot would be very valuable. Michael > On Jun 29, 2017, at 19:44, Hund, Johannes <johannes.hund@siemens.com> wrote: > > >> I have been working on dockerizing node-wot and >> have a working image for ubuntu/x86 targets. >> >> https://hub.docker.com/r/mjkoster/node-wot-ubuntu/ > > Great, thanks! > >> On startup, it calls an external nodejs script according to the same pattern of the >> OCF servers. The dockerfile and startup file are in a fork of the node-wot repo: >> https://github.com/thingweb/node-wot/compare/master...mjkoster:mjk- >> dockerization?expand=1 > > I'd open a Pull-request for this, we'd probably need your consent that this will be published under MIT license (for now) and eventually later unter W3C and other licenses. > >> I am having problems with the raspberry pi version and will upload it when I figure >> out what is going wrong. > > If you use the raspberry-pi example, it could be related to the unicorn daemon (the driver of the 8x8 LED field) > >> I'm not sure if the external networking is functional yet either, but I wanted to >> share the status. > > Sounds great, thanks for the update! > Will have a look at it and see if I can help. >
Received on Thursday, 29 June 2017 13:06:25 UTC