W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-ig@w3.org > June 2017

[TF-LD] minutes - 23 June 2017

From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 00:20:49 +0900
Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9XbP8TUSPt++ba6ZgDa+5AiJbpFxXbUpeqoYZbs45-_VA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
available at:

also as text below.

Thank you very much for taking these minutes (again), Michael Koster!




      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                             WoT IG - TF-LD

23 Jun 2017

   See also: [2]IRC log

      [2] http://www.w3.org/2017/06/23-wot-irc


          Kaz_Ashimura, Dave_Raggett, Maria_Poveda,
          Michael_Koster, Michael_McCool, Taki_Kamiya, Aparna,
          Danh_Le_Phuoc, Victor_Charpenay, DarkoAnicic




     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]F2F prep and three technical topics
         2. [5]Semantic processing
         3. [6]Thing Description Recipes
     * [7]Summary of Action Items
     * [8]Summary of Resolutions

   <kaz> scribenick: mjkoster

F2F prep and three technical topics

   darko: who on the call is working on vocabularies?

   maria: looking at mappings between SAREF and oneM2M
   ... seems like there are few classes in these models

   mccool: working on OCF E-R diagram

   dsr: looking at OCF, SAREF and how to create a bridging
   ... has done the interaction model and ready for the next step

   <MariaPoveda> The mappings between SAREF and oneM2M are here
   [9]https://goo.gl/aVG1q2 but there should be an updated version

      [9] https://goo.gl/aVG1q2

   darko: we could start contributing these results
   ... folders with examples in the link
   ... this is the place to contribute


     [10] https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/linked-data

   <DarkoAnicic> Vocabularies:

     [11] https://github.com/wot/blob/master/linked-data/linked-data-vocabularies.md

   (discussion on who can accept and how to accept pull requests)

   <kaz> kaz: have checked with the WoT Chairs and got OK to
   create a GitHub Team for the WoT IG Editors including Darko. So
   will create that Team on GitHub.

   victor: updated current practices document
   ... working on exposing SSN information as wot things

   darko: what do we want to demonstrate at the plugfest?

   danh: do we want to do semantic alignment and mapping?

   darko: we are just at the beginning and should start with
   something simple
   ... work toward a common set of terms
   ... so everyone can discover and integrate using common terms

   dsr: even for simple scenarios there is a need for context, at
   least location to start with

   darko: shall we define some scenarios and specific need for
   additional common vocabulary?

   dsr: yes, that's the general idea
   ... but be careful what we are trying to standardize vs. what
   we need to define for plugfest

   danh: work from concrete scenarios and what is available

   victor: has an outstanding PR with some of these concepts

   danh: start with scenarios, then build recipes etc on top of

   victor: share screen with the PR material

   <kaz> [12]Pull Request 331 by Victor

     [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/331

   victor: same table as shown in TD meeting, PR #331
   ... integrates many vocabularies including geospatial, etc.

   darko: need scenarios to be described, how to motivate people
   to implement the annotation

   victor: the intention is that participants will annotate their

   kaz: how can we collaborate with TD and consolidate the
   discussion, can we have a joint call before the F2F?

   mjkoster: need a follow-on discussion on the semantic

Semantic processing

   danh: bring up PR on screen
   ... enable discovery using terms from different vocabularies
   ... based on a semantic bridge
   ... ontology to consolidate other ontologies

   dsr: decoupled ontology development is more scalable, and can
   be harmonized using intermediary concepts in a bridging

   danh: like an integration context?

   dsr: provide common concepts across ontologies
   ... can't always map directly

   danh: there are some different techniques for bridging

   dsr: looking at existing work e.g. inter-iot (reference?)

   danh: maybe going different directions but targeting the same
   ... using sub-class mapping rules developed for domain-specific

   dsr: a bridging ontology can be used for discovery, for
   adaptation there may be more logic involved e.g. translation
   ... use concrete concepts like temperature, etc.

   <dsr> mapping may depend on the context, e.g. the data and

   danh: use common scenarios

   <dsr> Inter-IoT [13]http://www.inter-iot-project.eu/ have done
   a lot of work on mapping between IoT ontologies

     [13] http://www.inter-iot-project.eu/

   <dsr> They say: INTER-IoT aim is to design, implement and test
   a framework that will allow

   <dsr> interoperability among different Internet of Things (IoT)

   victor: tools question?

   <victor> I was asking about using the HyLAR JS reasoner

     [14] https://www.npmjs.com/package/hylar)

   kaz: do we want to work with automatic ontology conversion?

   danh: they don't try to convert ontologies but use rules for

   kaz: similar to the topic of binding template

   danh: should use logic and reasoner to do the job at scale

   kaz: matthias is proposing a separate protocol binding template
   topic, because "protocol binding template" is related to all
   the other topics including this LD discussion.
   ... and we can discuss the relationship between one and another
   during the next Wednesday call

   danh: can demonstrate step by step process that makes it easier
   to understand

Thing Description Recipes

   darko: third topic, recipes
   ... example of a recipe to turn on a light when motion is
   detected in a room

   <DarkoAnicic> Recipe:

     [15] https://github.com/wot/blob/master/linked-data/thing-description-recipes.md

   darko: json-ld example


     [16] https://github.com/wot/tree/master/linked-data/contributions/thing-description-recipes

   darko: please review and comment
   ... defines the recipe for orchestrating the interaction
   capabilities of multiple devices

   using iot.schema.org capabilities

   maria: are the semantics included in the recipe or imported?

   darko: the semantic annotation is included in the recipe, and
   is used to discover and configure
   ... comments?

   dsr: this brings up the question of semantic composition vs.
   syntactic composition of interfaces?

   darko: please contribute to these activities and review/comment

   danh: will we still try to converge by the plugfest?

   darko: yes, we hope to start the process of convergence
   ... we need to drive toward involving all the participants
   ... time is short but we can make some demonstrations and a
   simple scenario with the motion sensor + light, temperature
   sensor + air conditioner
   ... follow up over email, no more telcos until F2F
   ... adjourn and thanks

   <kaz> [ adjourned ]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]

    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version
    1.152 ([18]CVS log)
    $Date: 2017/06/23 15:17:43 $

     [17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Friday, 23 June 2017 15:22:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:27:12 UTC