- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:46:18 +0900
- To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at: https://www.w3.org/2017/04/12-wot-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks for taking notes, Yongjing! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - WoT IG/WG 12 Apr 2017 [2]Agenda [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#Agenda See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2017/04/12-wot-irc Attendees Present Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_Koster, Ari_Keranen, Daniel_Peintner, Dave_Raggett, Feng_Zhang, Johannes_Hund, Kunihiko_Toumura, Matthias_Kovatsch, Michael_McCool, Niklas_Widell, Takeshi_Yamada, Keiichi_Tokuyama, Uday_Davuluru, Yongzing_Zhang, Yingying_Chen, Michael, McCool, Achille_Zappa, Masato_Ohura, Zoltan_Kis, Katsuyoshi_Naka, Kazuaki_Nimura Regrets Chair Matthias, Michael, Yongjing Scribe Yongjing, Kaz Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Agenda 2. [6]Osaka F2F 3. [7]Scripting TF report * [8]Summary of Action Items * [9]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ Agenda <inserted> scribenick: kaz Matthias: Osaka meeting and TF reports Ari: management interface discussion today? Matthias: not sure given we don't have Zoltan Ari: unfortunately, can't make the Osaka meeting Matthias: we can continue the discussion on the list Osaka F2F <kaz> scribenick: yongjing Matthias: anyone from Panasonic? ... deadline for F2F registration? regarding dinner and room Ohura: Apr 21st is the deadline [10]registration site [10] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/WoTF2F201705/ Matthias: how many people can be invited? what's the room size for the open day? Ohura: the capacity is 100 people ... dinner shares the same deadline Matthias: currently 21 attendees, 2 remote participants kaz: can accept late registration for the meeting? Ohura: ok McCool: late registration is not applicable to dinner reservation [11]Osaka f2f wiki [11] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_May_2017,_Osaka,_Japan Matthias: reminder for TF leads: put breakout agenda for F2F ... Matthias: if multiple slots needed, please reserve multiple bullets ... last week of Apr should freeze the agenda input ... binding template heavily rely on liaison. do we have input by Osaka? OCF for instance? ... what's the ocf plugfest status? Koster: it's ongoing. don't exact status now. Would work with Zoltan et al. .... will drive that in the next weeks Matthias: we dont have many representitives to report TF status <inserted> scribenick: kaz Yongjing: open day and plugfest in parallel? Matthias: better to concentrate on plugfest on Monday Yongjing: ok ... may bring some information on oneM2M for Open Day McCool: can bring some example of OCF devices Koster: we can see what we can within a few weeks Scripting TF report <inserted> scribenick: yongjing Matthias: ask Zoltan to discuss the management i/f Zoltan: on Monday scripting call, discussed mgmt i/f ... reluctant to call it 'mgmt i/f' <kaz> [12]Scripting minutes [12] https://www.w3.org/2017/04/10-wot-minutes.html Zoltan: would be very useful to discuss based on common use cases.. scripting API sit on top of security McCool: API to install the scripts need to be protected. Zoltan: we don't have it anymore we should revisit some assumptions, in security document we could discuss security architecture, provisioning ... in F2F or in prior Ari: a lot of attraction of LWM2M in addition to OCF/oneM2M Zoltan: we have looked in to LWM2M recently ... security TF will first clarify what are the use cases, actors, ... then think of the underlying platforms <kaz> [13]2-runtime(servient) example local thing and remote thing [13] https://www.w3.org/2017/04/wot/local-thing+remote-thing.png kaz: Matthias pointed out this discussion was related to synchronization discussion, and I'd agree to that view ... it might be useful to think of some models including version management capability like git ... runtime B on the right side above may manage actual TD properties using git to handle multiple requests from more than UA runtime ... and think about when/how to merge which request based on the context ... will respond to the email discussion as well Dave: emphasize the need of collecting use cases <dsr> some use cases: [14]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wot-wg/2017Apr/ 0001.html [14] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wot-wg/2017Apr/0001.html jhund: we have collected micro use cases for scripting API ... question is can we add scripts at run time? ... this topic may impact plenary ... we should pick up this topic in Osaka Zoltan: a script is always a deployment scripts, we don't deploy script anymore (?) Matthias: the two things you're mentioning are equivalent <dsr> (a thing is often more than just a script) Matthias: the original assumption is that scripts is always locally creating things <dsr> +1 to Matthias on embedding the management interface via a thing Zoltan: it's misunderstanding of my intention ... using existing mechanism avoiding creating additional mgmt API Matthias: define the problem clearly first, then discuss in the joint call among different TFs kaz: we can start with the above two run time model proposed by Johannes Dave: we should first have concrete use case as the discussion ground McCool: do we have use case template to follow? ... create repository in github/wiki ... suggest to have one session in F2F on use case Matthias: concerned putting independent use cases together is meaningless ... we need more input on the topic we just discussed for the f2f. McCool: scripting api, use case can be two agenda items for next call. [ adjourned ] Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [15]scribe.perl version 1.152 ([16]CVS log) $Date: 2017/04/12 14:25:58 $ [15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [16] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2017 16:47:35 UTC