- From: Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:12:35 +0200
- To: public-wot-ig@w3.org
Hello Matthias, CoAP over WebRTC (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-groves-coap-webrtcdc/) also has some benefits with regards to firewall/NAT traversal due to the underlying WebRTC framework. Regards, Christian ..snip.. >> A few years ago, we used WebSockets to control a robot through ROS and >> Rosbridge from a Web browser. I think WebSocket can be convenient for Web >> standard-compliant pub/sub across firewalls. > Firewall traversal is one of the bizarre things where WebSockets have a practical benefit. What you are describing would mean that you have a standard-compliant and globally accepted pub/sub protocol that you speak over WebSockets. That will then be the actual application protocol to which we need to map. > > BTW: There is also CoAP-over-WebSockets in the making. > > Best regards > Matthias > > >
Received on Monday, 24 October 2016 11:13:12 UTC