- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:19:32 +0900
- To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9WLG3+TfcfhBLQ5JM5kPEv+LbXQ3jt2RybYRRX0uwT9EA@mail.gmail.com>
available at: https://www.w3.org/2016/12/14-wot-td-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking these minutes, Daniel! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - TD Restructuring 14 Dec 2016 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/14-wot-td-irc Attendees Present Kaz_Ashimura, Daniel_Peintner, Takuki_Kamiya, Sebastian_Kaebisch, Uday_Davuluru, Darko_Anicic, Matthias_Kovatsch, Yingying_Chen, DarkoAnicic, Katsuyoshi_Naka Regrets Dave_Raggett Chair Sebastian Scribe Daniel Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]decisions about new TD version * [5]Summary of Action Items * [6]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ <kaz> scribenick: dape decisions about new TD version SK: Next week will be the last TD call ... next week I would like to discuss PlugFest topics ... should finalize TD version ... updated CP document according to change requests ... got additional comments, see [7]https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/287 ... issue is about renaming... re-structering ... MK proposed changes ... we should manage today to make a decision and get ready for next PlugFest ... MK proposed to use Web vocabulary ... e.g., link vs endpoint ... e.g., uri vs. href ... e.g., mediaType vs type [7] https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/287 MK: split up issue into 2 SK: issue #289 <inserted> [8]Issue-289 [8] https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/289 MK: Instead of uri we should call it href ... endpoint is usually socket address.. <inserted> [9]Matthias' proposal [9] https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/proposals/td-restructuring/mkovatsc-use-known-names.jsonld MK: propose to use link and href ... this is mainly about name changes ... also propose simplifying overall structure ... under interaction you have links ... should we allow multiple hrefs? ... looked at web linking RFC.. just one mediatype is supported ... propose ONE mediaType as shown in example ... one more tweak... in metadata there is key "base" ... essentially base uri ... instead of allowing array it should be at most ONE base uri ... alternate protocols may use absolute uri SK: changes are as follows ... instead of endpoint we use links <kaz> (much noise on WebEx and people had to rejoin...) SK: question to group. What do people think ... should simplify processing.. no arithmetic for detecting right uri et cetera DP: +1 MK: +1 TK: think is good Kaz: +1 Uday: fine by me YC: +1 DP: what about type vs mediaType? MK: HTML uses type ... conflict in JSON schema ... however, should be fine ... once we have everything together we might consider special naming ... OR scoping should resolve issue SK: Agree ... may confuse a bit DP: see difference in JSON schema vs web-linking type ... JSON schema tools are out there MK: web linking tools come up also.. ... so same same ... TD uses metadata around actual web linking node ... link for "temperature" is the actual link and not the current TD SK: what if we keep mediaType? MK: breaks web linking.. which is somewhat broken anyway DP: Let's try to stick with type and see whether we run into problems... should be resolvable according context SK: Darko, do you see any issues? Darko: where is "type" defined? ... propose to define contexts for IANA and JSON schema SK: prefix should make it clear DP: propose to look whether prefixes break JSON schema tools Darko: Not sure about the issue... JSON schema tools have issue already .. type is there twice DP/MK: context will resolve issue Darko: agree w.r.t. to processing but not w.r.t. semantics MK: think we need proper model to resolve those and similar issues ... e.g., valid JSON-LD document Darko: local "type" without prefix means part of TD ... not of JSON Schema SK: How can we solve the issue? ... going back to mediaType key OR look into JSON-LD and how we can resolve this issue MK: It is not proper fixed by just renaming ... scoping/context should apply ... for hot fixing propose to rename it to mediaType ... anyhow.. have to look into how to resolve it SK: OK, lets rename it back to mediaType Naka: seems ok also for me SK: MK had other issue, #290 ... rename outputType just to output <kaz> [10]Issue-290 [10] https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/290 MK: compared to other examples, outputType, valueType etc it is just a hook ... get rid of obsoletes nodes and simplify to input and output SK: I do not have a strong opinion ... type is already in JSON schema... et cetera MK: renaming is less critical... ... can reconsider that anyway... short and simple DP: Can you show example.. <kaz [11]Example TD for Structured Data [11] https://w3c.github.io/wot/current-practices/wot-practices.html MK: remove "valueType" SK: not sure anymore why we had "valueType" in the first place ... guess it was based on semantic annotation MK: propose to put semantic on "type" level DP: breaks JSON schema tools MK: not doing it causes issues with semantic annotations in complex types SK: JSON schema people restarted their work ... should get in touch with them DP: Propose to get in touch with them ... raise issues SK: can do that Darko: would not remove valueType unless issue is resolved MK: OK. lets put that on hold SK: Will integrate changes to CP ... freeze CP latest next week ... next week is about PlugFest scenarios [ adjourned ] Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [12]scribe.perl version 1.148 ([13]CVS log) $Date: 2016/12/14 08:15:39 $ [12] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [13] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2016 08:20:50 UTC