I agree with that. This folder should also include the proposal for complex data types and other possible TD extensions (https://github.com/vcharpenay/wot/tree/master/TF-TD/TD%20Extensions). Regards, Victor From: Kovatsch, Matthias [mailto:matthias.kovatsch@siemens.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 27. April 2016 17:47 To: Hund, Johannes (CT RDA NEC EMB-DE); Michael Koster; Public Web of Things IG Subject: [GitHub] Organizing the repository Von: Hund, Johannes [mailto:johannes.hund@siemens.com] @All: should we have a folder under current-practices for proposals/discussion bases? How about a “proposals” folder in the root? Once we have consensus, we can move it to the corresponding well-known folder. So far, concrete bins such as the task forces or Architecture vs Current Practices did not work out well. It always took us a while to see where it fits… I will need another folder soon for the protocol binding topic, so it would be good to agree on something soon :) Can we also delete the “plugfest” folder? It is outdated, and hence confusing. Can we rename ucr-doc to something less cryptic? “use-cases-requirements”? And the README still says “and technology landscape”… Would need some help for the build script update… Ciao Matthias
Received on Friday, 29 April 2016 07:48:32 UTC