Re: [use cases] organisation of use case contributions [was: rough taxonomy]

Dear All,
I am proposing to work on the following scenario based on our experience with the Oxford Flood Network:

Volunteer                           Use Case Title                                                  UC Category
———————————————————————————————————————————————————
Edoardo Pignotti The Oxford Flood Network                 smart cities/ other utilities/ Monitoring water levels for flood warnings

All the best,

Edoardo




From: <Heuer>, Joerg <Joerg.Heuer@siemens.com<mailto:Joerg.Heuer@siemens.com>>
Date: Saturday, 7 March 2015 11:05
To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-wot-ig@w3.org>>
Cc: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org<mailto:dsr@w3.org>>, 전종홍 <hollobit@etri.re.kr<mailto:hollobit@etri.re.kr>>
Subject: [use cases] organisation of use case contributions [was: rough taxonomy]
Resent-From: <public-wot-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-wot-ig@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Saturday, 7 March 2015 11:06

Reviewing the Taxonomy I was wondering if it can help us to organize the work and the contributions in the group.

Some thoughts:

·         According to the chartered goals of the IG, the work on the compilation of the technology landscape / survey and the derived findings are quite important.

·         To have a common ground for this discussion we need a collection of a use case collection spread across the domains on which we want to focus on

·         To have sufficient time to discuss the technology survey we should have a first use case compilation by end of April

Along this thoughts what would be reasonable to organize the use case work in the next 4 weeks?
Can I ask every participant in the group to volunteer for one use case and contribute it to the list within the next two weeks?

Proposed approach:
To also achieve a use case compilation across application domains please sent a note by adding an entry in the list below

a)      what use case you pick and

b)      in what class according to the taxonomy it falls.
To spread the use cases across the domains in a first run could you on a first come basis check if there is already a volunteer in that particular application domain category (see taxonomy in [1]) in the list below.

Find a start of the mentioned list below. Please comment.

Volunteer                           Use Case Title                                                  UC Category
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave                     Smart control of washing machine          smart home / home automation / deferred operation
Joerg                    EV Charging                                                      smart cities / smart grid / advanced distribution / devices adapt supply


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Use_cases_across_application_domains


Von: Dave Raggett [mailto:dsr@w3.org]
Gesendet: Freitag, 6. März 2015 15:26
An: 전종홍
Cc: Public Web of Things IG
Betreff: Re: [use cases] rough taxonomy


On 6 Mar 2015, at 04:26, 전종홍 <hollobit@etri.re.kr<mailto:hollobit@etri.re.kr>> wrote:

Great job !! I’d like to suggest minor comment.

I think it would be good to divide into another high-level category “Smart Lifecare”.

  *   Smart Lifecare

     *   Sports and lifestyle

        *   Fitness related use cases

     *   Healthcare and medical

        *   Remote patient monitoring and care
        *   Self monitoring and wellness

Thanks for the suggestion. I have used it to update the wiki page, see:

https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Use_cases_across_application_domains


I am now adding a section on use case writing styles.

—
   Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org<mailto:dsr@w3.org>>