W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-ig@w3.org > March 2015

RE: [WoT IG] UC document & Agenda

From: <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 07:15:41 +0000
To: <Joerg.Heuer@siemens.com>, <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3CD3C8BBF0D87B4D8154C3978732049C50DF91E9@exmbx05-cdc.nexus.csiro.au>
Many of these, currently under development in the Spatial Data on the Web working Group,
are very relevant to WoT.  https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Working_Use_Cases


They cover  many of those topics you mention, plus some for e-science.

Kerry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heuer, Joerg [mailto:Joerg.Heuer@siemens.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 3 March 2015 8:57 AM
> To: public-wot-ig@w3.org
> Subject: [WoT IG] UC document & Agenda
> 
> Hello Jonathan, all,
> 
> are you aware of further documents or input for the WoT use case
> document?
> A proposal for an agenda item in tomorrow's call is to discuss the UC
> document structure. For this you might review the two documents
> referenced below:
> http://dret.github.io/W3C/WoTIG/WoT-UCR.html

> http://hollobit.github.io/wot-req/

> 
> To have a joint understanding of application domains a generic agenda
> issue "domain reports" have been planned, i.e. smart home, smart
> cities, transportation, health care, logistics, marketing, ... Do you
> have some background in a particular application domain, which you
> could share?
> 
> In line with the ConfCall last week we have the following points on the
> agenda for the confcall march 3rd, 6pm GMT:
> 
> - Welcome and intro
> - Logistics of the WoT IG (see also minutes from confcall last week)
> - Review and setup of use case documents
> - Contributions for domain reports
> 
> Do you have further agenda issues on the radar?
> 
> BR,
> Joerg
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Erik Wilde [mailto:dret@berkeley.edu]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015 11:59
> An: 전종홍; public-wot-ig@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: merging UCR document
> 
> hello jonathan.
> 
> On 2015-02-24 11:18, 전종홍 wrote:
> > I saw current version of new UCR draft.
> > http://dret.github.io/W3C/WoTIG/WoT-UCR.html

> > I think it would be good to reference the general requirement part
> > from previous our REQ work.
> > http://hollobit.github.io/wot-req/

> 
> this looks indeed like a lot of overlap and a good potential to merge.
> let's wait and see what the IG decides to do (if there will be an
> "official" document prepared in the IG) and if so, then maybe one way
> to go would be to merge those two documents as a possible starting
> point.
> 
> thanks and cheers,
> 
> dret.
> 
> --
> erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu  -  tel:+1-510-2061079 |
>            | UC Berkeley  -  School of Information (ISchool) |
>            | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |

Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2015 07:16:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:26:26 UTC