W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-ig@w3.org > June 2015

RE: [TF-AP] Minutes of the TF-AP call on 17.06.2015

From: <kajimoto.kazuo@jp.panasonic.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 13:17:24 +0000
To: <johannes.hund@siemens.com>, <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
CC: <kajimoto.kazuo@jp.panasonic.com>
Message-ID: <FF475F4E041C8C41B696C42C4516BB8F0BE766@WEX00081.jp.corp.sanyo.com>
Dear Johannes-san and all,

I'd like to add some comments in [3] by attached pdf.
[3] https://github.com/w3c/wot/wiki/Architecture-Model

The comments consist of 2 parts.
1) I agree 2 layers in the basic architecture as [3]
   And then notification flow from physical device, creation and register entry 
   WoT servient(virtual object) flow, delete WoT servient(virtual object) flow,
   Those 3 might be missing.
2) Treatment of implementation
   Implementation is just reference, TF-AP would like to discuss abstract API.
   On the other hand, everyone has his own reference architecture, so it seems
   to be harder to agree the API concept.
   So, I try to make it clear where is common API across whole implementation
Kazuo Kajimoto
Senior Councillor of Groupwide Software Strategy,
Groupwide CTO Office

-----Original Message-----
From: Hund, Johannes [mailto:johannes.hund@siemens.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 10:58 PM
To: public-wot-ig@w3.org
Subject: [TF-AP] Minutes of the TF-AP call on 17.06.2015

Dear task force,

please find the minutes of your last call here:

Thanks to Vlad for scribing & presenting.

Key findings:
- We will have a joint F2F with IRTF's RG on thing-to-thing communication in July (in Prague). We should identify what topics we want to discuss there in the next calls.
- There has been many updates in the proposed thing model on github [1], which is meant as a discussion starter. Please feel free to comment and suggest changes.
- The framework implementation from Dave et al. [2] is based on the same principles, but differs in some aspects to what is currently discussed in the TF. We will need to see how to better stay in sync.
- For the WoT IG F2F end of July, we will provide three submissions from the task force:
	1. A model for the Architecture applicable to the use cases. (arch-model)
	2. A model of resources and interactions used to concretely discuss the WoT interactions. (thing-model)
	3. A landscape of protocols and technologies we see relevant for a standardization work in WoT. (tech-landscape)
- We were preparing "arch-model" in the github wiki [3]
- The "thing-model" will be generated out of the files and folders in [1].
- Lastly, we need input for the "tech-landscape", which would be relevant protocols or IoT frameworks resp. APIs that should be investigated for the standardization work. I have put up a brief wiki page at [4], where I ask everyone to contribute. 

Best Regards,

[1] https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/TF-AP/wot-compose-recommendation/web-things-model

[2] https://github.com/w3c/web-of-things-framework

[3] https://github.com/w3c/wot/wiki/Architecture-Model

[4] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Technology_Landscape

Received on Sunday, 21 June 2015 13:18:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:26:35 UTC