W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-whatwg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [whatwg] Should editable elements have placeholder attribute?

From: David Young <dyoung@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 13:10:30 -0500
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Message-ID: <20120502181030.GT20070@pixotech.com>
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:02:10PM +0300, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@webkit.org> wrote:
> > Great. I think the tricky part will be defining exactly how and when the
> > placeholder is displayed.
> >
> > e.g. Should it be treated as if there is a text node in the editable
> > element? Should we ignore things like "<br>" or collapsible spaces when
> > determining whether the element is empty or not?
> 
> Currently the spec isn't clear about this for <input>, so I don't
> think it needs to specify exactly for <textarea> or contenteditable
> either.  It can be left as a UI decision.  As far as QoI goes, I think
> you'd want to display it as long as there's no visible text or images
> or things.  <p><br></p> should still display the placeholder, and
> probably so should <p><font color=red><br></font></p>, etc.  As long
> as there's no text (or <img>, etc.) that's visible to the user -- if
> it *looks* empty, the placeholder should display.

I think that what you describe may hide state from the user (e.g., hides
the style that will apply) and limits which positions you can point at
with the mouse.

A better alternative is that <p><br></p> displays a character that holds
the position of the <br> and indicates its presence.  You could use a
return symbol, ⏎, or interpunct, ·, for the purpose.  In the example
<p><font color=red><br></font></p>, color that character red.

Dave

-- 
David Young
dyoung@pobox.com    Urbana, IL    (217) 721-9981
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 21:13:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:07:52 UTC