W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2017

Re: [whatwg] Allow alt attribute with the span element

From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 11:23:28 -0400
Message-ID: <CANCFA+HzYrqYtHR9YAp+jwbebj7sihiWQd-R4pZyzsOXfGY0og@mail.gmail.com>
To: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
Cc: "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters@domblogger.net>
Is there a problem with using aria-label
<https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/states_and_properties#aria-label> for this
use case? It seems like this should do exactly what you're asking for in
the given scenario.

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Michael A. Peters <mpeters@domblogger.net>

> With images, the alt attribute can and should be used to give a
> description of an image for users who can not see the image.
> With text, some glyphs are pictographs that have a meaning. For example,
> U+1F502 is a pictograph indicating single loop, but it is meaningless if
> you can not see it.
> Even if screen readers can specify the codepoint and/or map the codepoint
> to a description (do they?) sometimes fonts define PUA codepoints for
> pictograph glyphs that are not official.
> A span element with a title attribute does not always solve this problem,
> sometimes the glyph is in a button element that has a title attribute
> describing what the button will do rather than the what the current state
> is.
> For example, a button may show a single loop indicating the media is
> currently in single loop mode but have a title attribute specifying that
> pressing it enables continuous loop mode.
> If there was an alt attribute on a span inside the button, screen readers
> could treat the span with a pictograph the same way it would treat an image
> child of a button attribute and describe the current pictograph to the end
> user.
> If there is already a solution to this issue, I apologize, I could not
> find one.
> We (er, WhatWG / W3C) could just add alt to the global attribute list too,
> rather than just span. Or come up with a semantic pictograph element
> specifically for this (just like we have tt and code).
> Thank you for opinions.
Received on Friday, 6 October 2017 15:24:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:44 UTC