- From: Michael A. Peters <mpeters@domblogger.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:15:47 -0700
- To: "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org >> WAI Interest Group" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
With images, the alt attribute can and should be used to give a description of an image for users who can not see the image. With text, some glyphs are pictographs that have a meaning. For example, U+1F502 is a pictograph indicating single loop, but it is meaningless if you can not see it. Even if screen readers can specify the codepoint and/or map the codepoint to a description (do they?) sometimes fonts define PUA codepoints for pictograph glyphs that are not official. A span element with a title attribute does not always solve this problem, sometimes the glyph is in a button element that has a title attribute describing what the button will do rather than the what the current state is. For example, a button may show a single loop indicating the media is currently in single loop mode but have a title attribute specifying that pressing it enables continuous loop mode. If there was an alt attribute on a span inside the button, screen readers could treat the span with a pictograph the same way it would treat an image child of a button attribute and describe the current pictograph to the end user. If there is already a solution to this issue, I apologize, I could not find one. We (er, WhatWG / W3C) could just add alt to the global attribute list too, rather than just span. Or come up with a semantic pictograph element specifically for this (just like we have tt and code). Thank you for opinions.
Received on Friday, 6 October 2017 15:16:19 UTC