W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2017

Re: [whatwg] rel=bookmark

From: Kevin Marks <kevinmarks@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 02:19:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD6ztsocSdJu0CSoWJp3XwB-cGE2u3Hn8tDO=5ROpOyqOXkPxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Cc: WHAT Working Group Mailing List <whatwg@whatwg.org>
That use case sounds more like rel="canonical"

On 6 Aug 2017 2:07 am, "Ed Summers" <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone can provide any information, or a pointer to
> previous discussion, about why the bookmark link relation can't be used
> with the <link> element [1].
>
> The topic has come up recently on the IETF link-relations discussion list
> [2] where a new link relation has been proposed to encourage persistent
> linking [3]. The proposed 'identifier' relation seems to closely resemble
> the idea of a permalink (a persistent link) that can be found in the
> definition of bookmark. If bookmark allowed use with the <link> element
> then I think there would be less of a demonstrated need for the new
> 'identifier' link relation.
>
> Thanks for any information you can provide. I apologize if I'm restarting
> a conversation that has already happened.
>
> //Ed
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-bookmark
> [2] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations/
> current/msg00670.html
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandesompel-identifier/
Received on Sunday, 6 August 2017 01:20:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 6 August 2017 01:20:22 UTC