- From: Patrick Dark <whatwg.at.whatwg.org@patrick.dark.name>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 13:45:51 -0500
- To: David Kendal <me@dpk.io>
- Cc: "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>
David Kendal 於 4/14/2017 11:58 AM 寫道: > On 11 Apr 2017, at 19:50, Patrick Dark <whatwg.at.whatwg.org@patrick.dark.name> wrote: > >> The "world wide web" is the user-facing portion of the Internet. Files >> on a CD or USB drive are not part of that. > You are continuing to dodge this problem by redefining the WHAT WG's > responsibilities. Please don't do that. > > If you can't take my word for it, how about the inventor of the > web itself? <https://gitter.im/solid/chat?at=58ed246d408f90be66aeeb30> > (Thanks to a correspondent, who I presume prefers to remain unnamed, > for sending this to me off-list.) "Appeal to authority" is a logical fallacy. An authoritative source doesn't make an argument true. I disagree with the idea that HTML files on offline media or a closed intranet are part of the "world wide web".
Received on Friday, 14 April 2017 18:46:25 UTC