Re: [whatwg] Reviving ImageBitmap options: Intend to spec and implement from Gregg Tavares on 2016-02-10 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from February 2016)

From: Gregg Tavares <gman@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 02:29:13 +0800
To: whatwg@whatwg.org
Message-ID: <CALouNzgNE5gHa=JERPsN2ii_wm1nQAkzBmapjzii6wjC6PxC1A@mail.gmail.com>

Is there a reason in the proposal many of the options default to
"implementation specific behavior"?

If the point of ImageBitmap is to get the data (use Image if you don't
care), then it seems like having any "implementation defined" options,
especially as the default, is just asking for lurking bugs in websites

Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 18:29:41 UTC