W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2016

Re: [whatwg] Reviving ImageBitmap options: Intend to spec and implement

From: Gregg Tavares <gman@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 02:29:13 +0800
Message-ID: <CALouNzgNE5gHa=JERPsN2ii_wm1nQAkzBmapjzii6wjC6PxC1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: whatwg@whatwg.org
Is there a reason in the proposal many of the options default to
"implementation specific behavior"?

If the point of ImageBitmap is to get the data (use Image if you don't
care), then it seems like having any "implementation defined" options,
especially as the default, is just asking for lurking bugs in websites
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 18:29:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:37 UTC