Re: [whatwg] New <SMELL> tag

Just a lighthearted April Fools, and that's it. 

Sorry if it made anyone upset.

Sent from my bathroom

Attachment: poo.sm

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Delfi Ramirez <delfin@segonquart.net> wrote:
> 
> Garrett et al:
> 
> I really appreciate your delicate sense of humour.  Not sure if all the people in the list does the same.
> 
> We all know  a computer-- opossite to we human beings - is unable to interpret correctly, unconciently,  the information  pheromones and smells have. I am speaking now like that old student of Biology Sciences who is not anymore.
> 
> But you have hit the nail with your delicate sense of humour. Really.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> ---
> Delfi Ramirez
> My digital signature
> 
> +34 633 589231
>  delfin@segonquart.net 
> twitter: delfinramirez
>  IRC: segonquart Skype: segonquart
> http://segonquart.net
> http://delfiramirez.info
>  
> 
>> On 2016-04-01 18:09, Garrett Smith wrote:
>> 
>> There has been good progress in HTML5 for <video> and <audio>.
>> 
>> But the <smell> tag has been missing — why?
>> 
>> Well no longer, now thanks to a new game-changing proposal:
>> <smell autoplay value="cocoa.sm">
>> 
>> But it occurred to me: This could be huge paradigm shift in towards Internet Odorous Things.
>> 
>> boolean `navigator.isSmellEnabled`
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> -- 
>> Garrett
>> Guitar Videos https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY_uK9hur86KEuiG8s7yvWw
>> @xkit

Received on Friday, 1 April 2016 18:58:23 UTC