W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2015

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: Two changes to iframe@sandbox

From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 20:59:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKXHy=fWoar808CUdaUaqwUsWA0jJFOcwfB=Nj6PN+KzRa-BNQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: WHAT Working Group Mailing List <whatwg@whatwg.org>
Cc: Chris Coyier <chriscoyier@gmail.com>, David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
> 2. Add a `allow-unsandboxed-auxiliary` keyword to those supported by the
> `sandbox` attribute, which, when present, would allow auxiliary browsing
> contexts created by `window.open` and `target="_blank"` links to create
> clean browsing contexts, unaffected by the sandbox which spawned them.

This flag is in the latest Chrome Canary,
behind chrome://flags/#enable-experimental-web-platform-features, if anyone
is interested in playing with the feature.

Given the generally positive response on this thread, WDYT about adding it
to HTML, hixie@?

I'd like to circle back to the `allow-modals` proposal once
https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/767 hits
stable and starts bringing in reliable data (~12 weeks). I'll ping the
thread again then. :)


Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, @mikewest

Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München,
Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der
Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth
(Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)
Received on Sunday, 17 May 2015 19:00:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:31 UTC