- From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:35:43 -0400
- To: whatwg@whatwg.org, public-html@w3.org
Let's just leave the sharing out of this. There is no data as to *why* it is being shared. All that is is a red-herring to the technical discussion. Web Components are what you are looking for. Problem is, JS required. However that isn't a deal-breaker in most projects. You make a custom element that contains within it the standard paragraphs, headers, asides, etc. and you can feed data into that. No problem. It is *exactly* what you are describing except it takes an extra step of making a custom component. > 75 million Wordpress sites and 200 million Tumblr blogs out there that treat web pages as basic documents. There is nothing restricting these sites from implementing web components under the hood. > And besides, there’s still the problem of having to download huge power inefficient Javascript libraries. No problem with web components, they are *built into the browser.* > ... break semantics with custom elements ... Semantics are only broken if you implement custom elements in a bad way. Making your own custom element just to put data into an <h1> is doing it incorrectly. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Bobby Mozumder <mozumder@futureclaw.com> wrote: > > On Mar 23, 2015, at 7:04 AM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote: > > The buzz mostly comes from throwing of "HTML6" into the title. HTML5 is a > buzzword and this creates new buzz for the "next version" to act as > click-bait for ad views. It also went viral from the mention since people > were mocking the idea of HTML6 (and the single-page app system proposed.) > As far as I know, HTML6 won't ever be an actual thing for any foreseeable > time to come. HTML5 is now the "Living Standard" of HTML and will continue > on indefinitely until it dies. > > > Also, you’ll find that people share things that they like. Editors might, > but readers have no vested interest in click-bait. > > -bobby > --- > Bobby Mozumder > *Editor-in-Chief* > FutureClaw Magazine > mozumder@futureclaw.com > +1-240-745-5287 > www.futureclaw.com > twitter.com/futureclaw <https://www.twitter.com/futureclaw> > www.linkedin.com/in/mozumder > >
Received on Monday, 23 March 2015 13:36:09 UTC