Re: [whatwg] Effect of image-orientation on naturalWidth/Height from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2015-03-13 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from March 2015)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:56:08 -0700
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Seth Fowler <seth@mozilla.com>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCuMnGjhzxNcV=_S1xqwg2_D_MnxGGaVcxm3OGju76i+w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Seth Fowler <seth@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> I wanted to get the opinion of this list on how image-orientation and the <img> element’s naturalWidth and naturalHeight properties should interact.
>
> I thought there was some agreement that image-orientation ought to be
> a markup feature as it affects the semantics of the image (or perhaps
> investigate whether rotating automatically is feasible):
>
>   https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25508

Yup, and thanks for linking the bug.

If it happens at the markup level, it should *definitely* affect the
naturalWidth/Height properties.  I don't think that's in question at
all.  But nobody's moved on the markup issue, so I haven't removed the
CSS property yet. ^_^

~TJ

Received on Friday, 13 March 2015 18:56:51 UTC